首页> 外文期刊>IMA Journal of Management Mathematics >Approaches to designing the revenue sharing contract under asymmetric cost information
【24h】

Approaches to designing the revenue sharing contract under asymmetric cost information

机译:非对称成本信息下的收益共享合同设计方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We investigate different approaches to designing price-only and revenue sharing (RS) contracts between a manufacturer and a newsvendor retailer in the case of asymmetric cost information. The manufacturer, i.e. contract designer, has estimations about the retailer's cost with the corresponding probabilities. We address two general approaches: in Approach 1, the manufacturer designs the contracts using the average of cost estimations, while in Approach 2, the manufacturer designs the contracts using all cost estimations. In Approach 2, we first model a reservation profit for each retailer type, explicitly based on the price-only contract (Approach 2-1). Then, we investigate how to design a unique RS contract (Approach 2-2) and a menu of coordinating RS contracts (Approaches 2-3 and 2-4). Approaches 2-2, 2-3 and 2-4 are designed based on a cut-off policy in which the manufacturer offers a price-only contract to the retailer if the retailer's cost is greater than a specific level. We find that in Approach 1, the price-only contract is more profitable than the RS contract for the manufacturer. Both firms' expected profits are increased considerably in Approach 2, as compared to Approach 1. Approach 2-4 results in the highest expected profit for both firms. However, if this approach leads to high administrative costs for the manufacturer, Approach 2-2 can be an appropriate substitute. Numerical analysis and a number of managerial and analytical insights are presented.
机译:我们研究了在成本信息不对称的情况下设计制造商与新闻零售商之间的仅价和收益共享(RS)合同的不同方法。制造商,即合同设计师,对零售商的成本以及相应的概率进行了估算。我们讨论两种通用方法:在方法1中,制造商使用平均成本估算来设计合同,而在方法2中,制造商使用所有成本估算来设计合同。在方法2中,我们首先基于纯价格合同(方法2-1),为每种零售商类型的预留利润建模。然后,我们研究如何设计唯一的RS合同(方法2-2)和协调RS合同的菜单(方法2-3和2-4)。方法2-2,方法2-3和方法2-4是基于截止策略设计的,在该策略中,如果零售商的成本大于特定水平,则制造商向零售商提供仅价格合同。我们发现在方法1中,仅价格合同比制造商的RS合同更有利可图。与方法1相比,方法2中两家公司的预期利润都大大增加。方法2-4导致两家公司的预期利润最高。但是,如果此方法导致制造商的高昂管理成本,则方法2-2可能是合适的替代方法。提出了数值分析以及许多管理和分析见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号