首页> 外文期刊>Hydrological Processes >Comparative study of neural network, fuzzy logic and linear transfer function techniques in daily rainfall-runof modelling under different input domains
【24h】

Comparative study of neural network, fuzzy logic and linear transfer function techniques in daily rainfall-runof modelling under different input domains

机译:不同输入域下日降雨径流模型中神经网络,模糊逻辑和线性传递函数技术的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper compares artificial neural network (ANN), fuzzy logic (FL) and linear transfer function (LTF)-based approaches forndaily rainfall-runoff modelling. This study also investigates the potential of Takagi-Sugeno (TS) fuzzy model and the impact ofnantecedent soil moisture conditions in the performance of the daily rainfall-runoff models. Eleven different input vectors undernfour classes, i.e. (i) rainfall, (ii) rainfall and antecedent moisture content, (iii) rainfall and runoff and (iv) rainfall, runoff andnantecedent moisture content are considered for examining the effects of input data vector on rainfall-runoff modelling. Usingnthe rainfall-runoff data of the upper Narmada basin, Central India, a suitable modelling technique with appropriate model inputnstructure is suggested on the basis of various model performance indices. The results show that the fuzzy modelling approachnis uniformly outperforming the LTF and also always superior to the ANN-based models. Copyright  2010 John Wiley &nSons, Ltd.
机译:本文比较了基于人工神经网络(ANN),模糊逻辑(FL)和线性传递函数(LTF)的日常降雨-径流建模方法。这项研究还研究了Takagi-Sugeno(TS)模糊模型的潜力以及早期土壤水分条件对日降雨-径流模型性能的影响。考虑了以下四个类别中的11种不同的输入向量,即(i)降雨,(ii)降雨和先行含水量,(iii)降雨和径流以及(iv)降雨,径流和先行含水量,以检查输入数据向量对降雨的影响径流建模。利用印度中部纳尔默达盆地上游的降雨径流数据,在各种模型性能指标的基础上,提出了一种具有适当模型输入结构的适宜建模技术。结果表明,模糊建模方法始终优于LTF,并且始终优于基于ANN的模型。版权所有©2010 John Wiley&nSons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号