...
首页> 外文期刊>Higher Education Research & Development >Investigating substantive and consequential validity of student ratings of instruction
【24h】

Investigating substantive and consequential validity of student ratings of instruction

机译:调查学生对教学评价的实质性和结果性有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study aimed at exploring faculty and student perspectives on student evaluations, as well as identifying their perceptions of the usefulness and appropriateness of the ratings for evaluating teaching effectiveness. More specifically, the study aimed at identifying the consequences, both intended and unintended, of using the evaluations, in addition to better understanding the process students used in responding to evaluations and what use faculty members made of them. Two surveys were developed and placed on the website of the Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. Emails were sent to all students and faculty participating in evaluations soliciting their cooperation and requesting their input. Faculty and student perceptions were compared qualitatively and statistically. Results revealed that students and faculty believe in the effectiveness and usefulness of the system with the need to overcome some negative consequences and biases inherent in its application at the University. Recommendations for system improvement are provided.
机译:本研究旨在探索教师和学生对学生评估的观点,并确定他们对评估教学效果的等级的有用性和适当性的看法。更具体地说,该研究旨在识别使用评估的预期和非预期的后果,此外还可以更好地理解学生在响应评估时所使用的过程以及教师对评估的使用方式。开展了两项调查,并将其放在机构研究和评估办公室的网站上。已向参与评估的所有学生和教师发送了电子邮件,以征求他们的合作并要求他们提供意见。对教师和学生的看法进行了定性和统计学比较。结果表明,学生和教职员工相信该系统的有效性和实用性,并且需要克服该系统在大学中所固有的一些负面影响和偏见。提供了有关系统改进的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号