首页> 外文期刊>Harvard design magazine >Breaking with Tradition
【24h】

Breaking with Tradition

机译:打破传统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The past 70 years have seen a dramatic change in living arrangements in the United States, from a preponderance of families with children in the postwar baby boom years to a much more diverse array of households, including significant shares of homes occupied by single persons, couples, and "nontraditional" families. Meanwhile, our housing stock has been slower to evolve. Housing can have a useful life of decades or more, and much of our current stock consists of detached single-family homes built in the second half of the 20th century. And though our households have grown smaller and more varied, we are still primarily building single-family homes- albeit larger versions-in part because we can afford them, and also because, whether from a failure to envision other options or deeply ingrained tastes, we favor them. Owning a single-family home, after all, has long been part of the American Dream. But it is also true that the legal, financial, and market systems in which we produce our housing were largely put in place during the postwar years, a period dominated by the nuclear family household. These frameworks are difficult to change, and the durability of housing means that the housing stock we have, and the stock we add each year, may be growing further away from what we actually need, now and in the future.
机译:在过去的70年中,美国的生活安排发生了巨大变化,从战后婴儿潮时期的大量有子女的家庭到种类繁多的家庭,包括单身,夫妻独占的住房的很大一部分和“非传统”家庭。同时,我们的住房存量发展缓慢。房屋的使用寿命可能长达数十年甚至更长,而我们目前的大部分财产都是在20世纪下半叶建造的独立式单户住宅。尽管我们的家庭规模越来越小,种类繁多,但我们仍然主要是在建造单户住宅(尽管版本更大),部分原因是我们买得起,也因为无论是由于无法设想其他选择还是根深蒂固的口味,我们支持他们。毕竟,拥有单户住宅长期以来一直是美国梦的一部分。但是,也确实是,我们生产住房的法律,金融和市场体系在战后时期(核家庭家庭主导的时期)已基本建立。这些框架很难更改,住房的持久性意味着我们现在和将来拥有的住房存量以及每年增加的存量可能会进一步远离我们的实际需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号