首页> 外文期刊>Futures >Towards better participatory processes in technology foresight: How to link participatory foresight research to the methodological machinery of qualitative research and phenomenology?
【24h】

Towards better participatory processes in technology foresight: How to link participatory foresight research to the methodological machinery of qualitative research and phenomenology?

机译:寻求更好的技术预见性参与过程:如何将参与性预见性研究与定性研究和现象学的方法学机制联系起来?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Technological progress does not happen in a social vacuum. Shaping of tomorrow is not possible without qualitative analyses. Therefore, the social and psychological dimensions of reality form an important part of technology foresight. Qualitative research will be needed to understand superficial and deep structures of social realities. So called push and pull factors are always linked to social behaviour. People's relationship to the use of technologies and the utilization of technologies is a complex and not a one-dimensional or monological issue. Monological methodological approaches can be harmful and confusing in the field of participatory foresight. We can conclude that the cycles of deductive and inductive logic are needed in science and in participatory foresight studies. Experts of the FTA community must have a higher level of methodological know-how in this research field and they should use qualitative methods in multi -faceted (external and internal) ways in foresight studies. Still the qualitative parts of many studies are quite monological and these studies can be quite problematic, even confusing. More critical methodological approaches should be taken into serious consideration. As a methodological approach, the principle of triangulation should be used more in the fields of participatory foresight studies and technology foresight.
机译:技术进步并不是在社会真空中发生的。没有定性分析,就不可能塑造明天。因此,现实的社会和心理维度构成了技术预见的重要组成部分。需要定性研究以了解社会现实的肤浅和深层结构。所谓的推拉因素总是与社会行为联系在一起。人们与技术使用和技术利用之间的关系是一个复杂的问题,而不是一维或一元论的问题。在参与式预见领域中,方法论方法可能有害且令人困惑。我们可以得出结论,科学和参与式预见性研究都需要演绎和归纳逻辑的循环。 FTA社区的专家必须在该研究领域中具有更高水平的方法专业知识,并且他们应在远见研究中以多方面(外部和内部)的方式使用定性方法。但是,许多研究的定性部分还是相当单一的,这些研究可能会引起很多问题,甚至令人困惑。应该认真考虑更关键的方法论方法。作为一种方法论方法,三角剖分原理应更多地用于参与式预见研究和技术预见领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号