...
首页> 外文期刊>Fire Technology >Statistical Characterization of Cable Electrical Failure Temperatures Due to Fire for Nuclear Power Plant Risk Applications
【24h】

Statistical Characterization of Cable Electrical Failure Temperatures Due to Fire for Nuclear Power Plant Risk Applications

机译:核电厂风险应用中因着火引起的电缆电气故障温度的统计特性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Single-value failure temperatures for fire loss of electrical cable functionality have been the norm for Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessments since the publication in 2005 of NUREG/CR-6850. If the calculated exposure temperature matches or exceeds the cable failure temperature, electrical failure is always assumed; if not, no failure is assumed. While this can be relaxed somewhat if a distribution for the exposure temperature is estimated, use of a distribution on the cable failure temperature itself more readily enables such relaxation and, therefore, a more realistic assessment. This paper develops probability distributions for different generic cable types (based on insulation) using data from the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission tests. Results indicate mean failure temperatures considerably higher than those used deterministically, 252A degrees C, 421A degrees C and 383A degrees C, respectively for thermoplastic, thermoset and Kerite-FRA (R). This suggests considerable relaxation from the conservatism inherent using the deterministic failure temperatures could be achieved. The paper then postulates two hypothetical distributions on the exposure temperature from applying a fire phenomenological model in a statistical way to estimate the possible relaxation using the distributed cable failure temperatures to enhance the realism of the assessment. Examples show that use of probabilistically-distributed cable failure temperatures (in conjunction with similar for exposure temperatures) can reduce the probability of electrical failure for a normally-distributed exposure temperature with a mean of 350A degrees C and standard deviation of 58.3A degrees C by factors of approximately three and eight for Kerite-FRA (R) and thermoset cables, respectively. The reduction would be less pronounced for thermoplastic cables, although larger reductions would be possible here as well for lower exposure temperatures (e.g., a factor of two).
机译:自2005年发布NUREG / CR-6850以来,用于电缆功能失火的单值故障温度一直是火灾概率风险评估的标准。如果计算出的暴露温度等于或超过电缆故障温度,则始终会发生电气故障;如果不是,则不假定失败。尽管如果估计暴露温度的分布可以稍微放松一下,但是使用电缆故障温度本身的分布更容易实现这种放松,因此可以进行更实际的评估。本文使用来自美国核监管委员会测试的数据来开发不同类型的通用电缆类型(基于绝缘)的概率分布。结果表明,平均故障温度明显高于确定性温度,分别是热塑性塑料,热固性塑料和Kerite-FRA(R)的252A摄氏度,421A摄氏度和383A摄氏度。这表明使用确定性故障温度可以从固有的保守性中获得很大的放松。然后,论文通过以统计方式应用火现象学模型来估计暴露温度的两个假设分布,从而使用分布的电缆故障温度来估计可能的松弛,从而增强评估的真实性。示例显示,使用概率分布的电缆故障温度(以及与之相似的暴露温度)可以降低平均分布温度为350A摄氏度且标准偏差为58.3A摄氏度的正态分布暴露温度的电气故障概率。 Kerite-FRA(R)和热固性电缆的系数分别约为3和8。对于热塑性电缆,这种降低将不太明显,尽管对于较低的暴露温度(例如,两倍),在此也可以进行较大的降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号