...
首页> 外文期刊>Expert systems with applications >Setting up standards: A methodological proposal for pediatric Triage machine learning model construction based on clinical outcomes
【24h】

Setting up standards: A methodological proposal for pediatric Triage machine learning model construction based on clinical outcomes

机译:建立标准:基于临床结果的儿科分流机学习模型施工方法的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Triage is a critical process in hospital emergency departments (ED). Specifically, we consider how to achieve fast and accurate patient Triage in the ED of a pediatric hospital. The goal of this paper is to establish methodological best practices for the application of machine learning (ML) to Triage in pediatric ED, providing a comprehensive comparison of the performance of ML techniques over a large dataset. Our work is among the first attempts in this direction. Following very recent works in the literature, we use the clinical outcome of a case as its label for supervised ML model training, instead of the more uncertain labels provided by experts.The experimental dataset contains the records along 3 years of operation of the hospital ED. It consists of 189,718 patients visits to the hospital. The clinical outcome of 9271 cases (4.98%) wa hospital admission, therefore our dataset is highly class imbalanced. Our reported performance comparison results focus on four ML models: Deep Learning (DL), Random Forest (RF), Naive Bayes (NB) and Support Vector Machines (SVM). Data preprocessing includes class imbalance correction, and case re-labeling. We use different well known metrics to evaluate performance of ML models in three different experimental settings: (a) classification of each case into the standard five Triage urgency levels, (b) discrimination of high versus low case severity according to its clinical outcome, and (c) comparison of the number of patients assigned to each standard Triage urgency level against the Triage rule based expert system currently in use at the hospital. RF achieved greater AUC, accuracy, PPV and specificity than the other models in the dychotomic classification experiments. On the implementation side, our study shows that ML predictive models trained according to clinical outcomes, provide better Triage performance than the current rule based expert system in operation at the hospital. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:分类是医院急诊部门(ED)的关键过程。具体而言,我们考虑如何在儿科医院的ED中实现快速准确的患者分类。本文的目标是建立用于将机器学习(ML)应用于儿科ED的分类的方法最佳实践,提供了在大型数据集中ML技术的性能的全面比较。我们的作品是在这个方向的第一次尝试之一。在最近的文献中的工作之后,我们使用案例的临床结果作为其用于监督ML模型培训的标签,而不是专家提供的更不确定的标签。实验数据集包含3年的医院ed 3年的记录。它由189,718名患者访问医院。临床结果为9271例(4.98%)WA医院入学,因此我们的数据集是高度级别的不平衡。我们报告的绩效比较结果侧重于四毫升型号:深度学习(DL),随机森林(RF),天真凸(NB)和支持向量机(SVM)。数据预处理包括类别不平衡校​​正,以及案例重新标记。我们使用不同的众所周知的指标来评估三种不同实验设置中ML型号的性能:(a)每种情况的分类成标准五个分类急性水平,(b)根据其临床结果,对低案例严重程度的歧视,以及(c)对当前在医院使用的分类规则的专家系统分配给每个标准分流紧急级别的患者数量的比较。 RF达到比当代分类实验中的其他模型更大的AUC,准确性,PPV和特异性。在实施方面,我们的研究表明,根据临床结果培训的ML预测模型,提供比医院的当前规则的专业专家系统提供更好的分流性能。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号