首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >TCL v Ericsson: US Court Determines Top-Down FRAND Royalty Rate for SEPs and Insists on Similar Percentage-of-Sales-Price Payments for High and Low Priced Devices
【24h】

TCL v Ericsson: US Court Determines Top-Down FRAND Royalty Rate for SEPs and Insists on Similar Percentage-of-Sales-Price Payments for High and Low Priced Devices

机译:TCL诉爱立信:美国法院确定标准必要专利的自上而下的FRAND特许权使用费率,并坚持以高价位设备和低价位设备的销售价百分比付款

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In TCL v Ericsson a district court issued a second major US FRAND judgment endorsing the "top-down" methodology and rejecting the "bottom-up " methodology for determining SEP royalties. The court also required substantially equal percentage-of-sales-price royalty payments for large and small competitors, and for upmarket and downmarket sellers alike, to satisfy FRAND's nondiscrimination requirement. The court's top-down approach may neutralise a trend among owners of large SEP portfolios to split up and diffuse their SEPs among many "privateers " in order to inflate total royalty payments.
机译:在TCL诉爱立信案中,地方法院发布了第二项美国FRAND重大判决,支持“自上而下”的方法论,并拒绝确定SEP特许权使用费的“自下而上”方法。法院还要求大大小小的竞争者以及高端和低端卖方都以相等的销售价格百分比的特许权使用费来满足FRAND的非歧视性要求。法院的自上而下的方法可能会抵消大型SEP资产组合所有者中将其SEP分散并分散到许多“私有者”中的趋势,从而增加总的特许权使用费。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号