首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >EPA Mine Spill in Colorado Raises Questions About Cleanup Cost, Responsibility
【24h】

EPA Mine Spill in Colorado Raises Questions About Cleanup Cost, Responsibility

机译:EPA在科罗拉多州发生的地雷泄漏引发了有关清理成本,责任的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

After Environmental Protection Agency investigators triggered the accidental release of 3 million gallons of mining wastewater and sediment into a river in southwest Colorado, the question arose-who, ultimately, will pay for the damage and cleanup? As an orange-tinted plume surged forth Aug. 5 from the blown-out Gold King Mine high in the Colorado Rockies, depositing sediment in the riverbed and staining rocks and brush in mustard-colored sludge, the EPA said it took "full responsibility" for the spill into the Animas River. "It pains me to no end to see this is happening," EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said six days after the incident. "It is a tragic and unfortunate accident and EPA is taking responsibility to ensure that it's cleaned up." But under the nation's Superfund law, and under other liability doctrines governed by the Clean Water Act and legal precedent, private sector entities are likely to find themselves held accountable for costs and cleanup associated with the accident and its aftermath, sources told BNA.
机译:在环境保护局的调查人员触发了向科罗拉多州西南部的一条河流中意外释放300万加仑采矿废水和沉积物之后,出现了一个问题-谁将最终为损害赔偿和清理工作付费? 8月5日,橙色的羽毛从科罗拉多洛矶山脉高空吹散的金王矿井喷涌而出,在河床中沉积了沉积物,并对岩石和芥末色的污泥进行了染色处理,美国环保署表示已承担“全部责任”泄漏到阿尼马斯河。事发六天后,美国环保局局长麦卡锡(Gina McCarthy)说:“看到这种情况发生,我无休止。” “这是一场不幸的不幸事故,EPA负责确保其得到清理。”消息人士告诉BNA,但根据国家的《超级基金法》以及《清洁水法》和其他法律先例所适用的其他责任原则,私营部门实体可能会为与事故及其后果相关的成本和清理负责。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter》 |2015年第36期|2695-2698|共4页
  • 作者

    Tripp Baltz;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号