首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space >Varieties of green: On aesthetic contestations over urban sustainability pathways in a Copenhagen community garden
【24h】

Varieties of green: On aesthetic contestations over urban sustainability pathways in a Copenhagen community garden

机译:绿色品种:关于哥本哈根社区花园的城市可持续发展途径的美学争论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Alongside kindred civic-driven and place-based urban greening initiatives, studies document an upsurge over the last decade in urban gardening and alternative food initiatives across a range of Euro-American settings. Meanwhile, historical and cultural inquiries into urban design, planning and politics suggest that the place and role of 'nature' in the city is now undergoing significant shifts. In this article, we deploy a case study of a civic-driven permaculture garden in Copenhagen in order to suggest a novel analytical grid of the imaginative and material domain of public aesthetic norms shaping current-day tensions over interventions in and valuations of the fabric of multiform green-spaces in the city. Reading across existing literatures, we model this domain along two structuring axes - of 'orderliness' versus 'wildness' and 'pastoral nature' versus city-nature 'imbrication' - and illustrate the usefulness of the resulting grid for making sense of internal debates and external criticisms in the Copenhagen permaculture gardening case. By assisting us in explaining how and why this garden struggled to carve out a legitimate space in a city otherwise committed to urban nature, we argue that attention to variable urban-green aesthetic commitments helps recast questions of urban sustainability politics in important ways.
机译:除了亲属的思域和地下的城市绿化倡议,研究文件在过去十年中,在一系列欧美环境中的城市园艺和替代食品举措中举办了巨大的升级。与此同时,历史和文化调查进入城市设计,规划和政治建议,“自然”在城市中的地方和角色正在进行重大班次。在本文中,我们部署了哥本哈根公民驱动的普遍植物养殖花园的案例研究,以提出公众审美规范的富有想象力和物质领域的新分析网格,其塑造了对织物的干预和估值的介入和估值在城市的多个绿色空间。在现有的文献中读取,我们沿着两个结构化轴模型的域 - 与“野性”和“牧师自然”与城市 - 自然的“自然” - 并说明了所产生的网格以实现内部辩论的有用性和哥本哈根渗透园艺案件的外部批评。通过协助我们解释这个花园在致力于致力于城市性质的城市中的合法空间,我们认为对可变的城市绿色审美承诺有助于重新推荐城市可持续性政治的重大问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号