首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Planning. A >Disaggregate journey-to-work data: implications for excess commuting and jobs-housing balance
【24h】

Disaggregate journey-to-work data: implications for excess commuting and jobs-housing balance

机译:分解上班途中数据:对通勤和工作与住房平衡的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Much of the analysis to date on the topic of excess commuting and jobs-housing balance deals with total commuting flow, undifferentiated with respect to worker and job characteristics. In this paper we explicitly address the disaggregation issue in terms of job and worker heterogeneity and show how to incorporate such details into the analysis of excess commuting. The objectives of this paper are (1) to develop a trip-distribution model disaggregating journey-to-work data according to type of occupation in order to estimate actual commutes; (2) to develop a disaggregated version of a linear program to measure theoretical minimum and maximum commutes; and, (3) to verify variations in excess commuting and jobs-housing balance according to type of occupation. Results of actual trip-length distributions for each occupation vary from 3.72 to 5 miles for Boise, Idaho, and from 4.27 to 7.78 miles for Wichita, Kansas. Minimum commutes vary from 0.95 to 3.58 miles and from 1.5 to 3.79 miles for Boise and Wichita, respectively. These results imply nonuniform levels of excess commuting and jobs/workers ratios. The proposed models are expected to have a wide range of uses in measurement and assessment of empirical patterns of commuting. The scope of the disaggregation can be extended to other targets, such as different types of industry, household structure, income level, ethnic background, education level, transportation mode, and gender. Further dimensions of disaggregation can address spatial interactions of different socioeconomic groups in urban areas, and, more generally, contribute to exploring urban sprawl according to job characteristics and industries.
机译:迄今为止,有关通勤和工作与住房余额过剩的大部分分析涉及的是通勤总流量,在工人和工作特征方面没有差异。在本文中,我们根据工作和工人的异质性明确解决了分类问题,并展示了如何将此类详细信息纳入过度通勤的分析中。本文的目的是(1)建立一个旅行分布模型,根据职业类型对上班途中的数据进行分类,以估计实际的通勤情况; (2)开发线性程序的分解版本,以测量理论上的最小和最大通勤; (3)根据职业类型核实通勤和工作住房余额的差异。每个职业的实际旅行时长分布结果,爱达荷州博伊西市为3.72英里至5英里,堪萨斯州威奇托市为4.27至7.78英里。博伊西和威奇托的最小通勤距离分别为0.95到3.58英里和1.5到3.79英里。这些结果表明通勤和工作/工人比例过高的水平不一致。预期所提出的模型在通勤经验模式的测量和评估中具有广泛的用途。分解的范围可以扩展到其他目标,例如不同类型的行业,家庭结构,收入水平,种族背景,教育水平,运输方式和性别。分解的进一步维度可以解决城市地区不同社会经济群体的空间相互作用,并且更广泛地说,根据工作特征和行业有助于探索城市扩张。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号