首页> 外文期刊>Engineering news-record >Why To Revoke Meier's Award
【24h】

Why To Revoke Meier's Award

机译:为何撤销迈尔奖

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Pritzker Prize organization has told the New York Times that it doesn't delve into its laureates' personal lives even though it considers sexual harassment and abuse serious matters. The organization has an opportunity now to reconsider and to accomplish as much as any award that honors excellence in architecture. It can followthe example set by other organizations that have revoked awards over sexual harassment and revoke the Pritzker Prize presented to the architect Richard Meier in 1984. The American Institute of Architects ought to take a similar path with the Gold Medal it awarded Meier in 1997.A good start for theThe Hyatt Foundation,which created the PritzkerArchitecture Prize in1979, would be to conductan investigation of Meier'salleged offenses, first revealed by the New York Times. That investigation need not be as exhaustive as the one that recently led to the exit of conductor James Levine from his role as director of the Metropolitan Opera in New York City. The opera's law firm, Proskauer & Rose, interviewed 70 people before showing its evidence to the opera's directors. That kind of long, costly probe is more appropriate for an employer.
机译:普利兹克奖组织告诉《纽约时报》,尽管它认为性骚扰和虐待很重要,但它并未深入研究获奖者的个人生活。该组织现在有机会重新考虑并完成尽可能多的荣誉,以表彰卓越的建筑。它可以遵循其他组织的榜样,这些组织取消了关于性骚扰的奖项,并撤销了1984年授予建筑师理查德·迈耶(Richard Meier)的普利兹克奖。美国建筑师协会应该采取与其获得的金牌类似的方法1997年Meier。 r n凯悦基金会的一个良好开端 r n 1979年创立了普利兹克建筑奖的凯恩基金会将对Meier's r进行调查违法犯罪,《纽约时报》首次披露。这项调查不必像最近导致指挥家詹姆斯·莱文(James Levine)退出纽约大都会歌剧院总监一职那样详尽。歌剧的律师事务所Proskauer&Rose在向歌剧导演展示证据之前采访了70人。这种漫长而昂贵的调查更适合雇主。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Engineering news-record》 |2018年第9期|64-64|共1页
  • 作者

    Richard Korman;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号