...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >The simple economics of motor vehicle pollution: A case for fuel tax
【24h】

The simple economics of motor vehicle pollution: A case for fuel tax

机译:机动车污染的简单经济学:燃油税案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The volume of pollution produced by an automobile is determined by driver's behavior along three margins: (i) vehicle selection, (ii) kilometers driven, and (iii) on-road fuel economy. The first two margins have been studied extensively, however the third has received scant attention. How significant is this 'intensive margin'? What would be the optimal policies when it is taken into account? The paper develops and analyzes a simple model of the technical and behavioral mechanisms that determine the volume emissions produced by a car. The results show that an optimal fuel tax would provide drivers with appropriate incentives along all three margins and that only public information is needed for a fuel tax to be set optimally. In contrast, an optimal distance tax would require private information. Lastly, relative to the optimal fuel tax, a simple uniform fuel tax is shown to be progressive. Thus, being already deployed worldwide, a uniform fuel tax is an attractive second-best policy. These findings should be accounted for when designing new mechanisms to alleviate motor vehicle pollution. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:汽车产生的污染量取决于驾驶员在以下三个方面的行为:(i)选择车辆,(ii)行驶公里数和(iii)公路燃油经济性。前两个边距已得到广泛研究,但是第三个边距却很少受到关注。 “密集利润”有多重要?考虑到最佳策略是什么?本文开发并分析了确定汽车排放量的技术和行为机制的简单模型。结果表明,最优燃油税将为驾驶员提供所有三个边际的适当激励,并且仅需要公共信息即可最佳设置燃油税。相反,最佳距离税将需要私人信息。最后,相对于最佳燃油税,简单的统一燃油税被证明是渐进的。因此,统一燃油税已经在全球范围内部署,是吸引人的第二好的政策。在设计减轻机动车污染的新机制时应考虑这些发现。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号