...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Fuel cell system economics: comparing the costs of generating power with stationary and motor vehicle PEM fuel cell systems
【24h】

Fuel cell system economics: comparing the costs of generating power with stationary and motor vehicle PEM fuel cell systems

机译:燃料电池系统的经济性:比较固定式和机动PEM燃料电池系统的发电成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This investigation examines the economics of producing electricity from proton-exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell systems under various conditions, including the possibility of using fuel cell vehicles (FCVs) to produce power when they are parked at office buildings and residences. The analysis shows that the economics of both stationary fuel cell and FCV-based power vary significantly with variations in key input variables such as the price of natural gas, electricity prices, fuel cell and reformer system costs, and fuel cell system durability levels. The "central case" results show that stationary PEM fuel cell systems can supply electricity for offices and homes in California at a net savings when fuel cell system costs reach about $6000 for a 5kW home system ($1200/kW) and $175,000 for a 250 kW commercial system ($700/kW) and assuming somewhat favorable natural gas costs of $6/G.I at residences and $4/GJ at commercial buildings. Grid-connected FCVs in commercial settings can also potentially supply electricity at competitive rates, in some cases producing significant annual benefits. Particularly attractive is the combination of net metering along with time-of-use electricity rates that allow power to be supplied to the utility grid at the avoided cost of central power plant generation. FCV-based power at individual residences does not appear to be as attractive, at least where FCV power can only be used directly or banked with the utility for net metering and not sold in greater quantity, due to the low load levels at these locations that provide a poor match to automotive fuel cell operation, higher natural gas prices than are available at commercial settings, and other factors.
机译:这项调查研究了在各种条件下由质子交换膜(PEM)燃料电池系统发电的经济性,包括在停放在办公楼和住宅时使用燃料电池车辆(FCV)发电的可能性。分析表明,固定燃料电池和基于FCV的动力的经济性随关键输入变量(例如天然气价格,电价,燃料电池和重整系统成本以及燃料电池系统耐用性水平)的变化而显着不同。 “中心案例”结果表明,当5kW家用系统的燃料电池系统成本达到约6000美元(1200美元/ kW)和250kW的175,000美元达到175,000美元时,固定式PEM燃料电池系统可以为加利福尼亚的办公室和家庭供电,从而实现了净节省。商业系统($ 700 / kW),假设住宅的天然气成本为$ 6 / GI,商业建筑的天然气成本为$ 4 / GJ。商业环境中的并网FCV还可潜在地以具有竞争力的价格提供电力,在某些情况下可产生巨大的年度收益。特别吸引人的是将净计量与分时电费相结合,从而可以避免中央发电厂的发电成本向公用电网供电。至少在FCV电源只能直接使用或由公用事业公司存储用于净计量而不能大量销售的情况下,由于在这些位置的低负载水平,单个住宅中基于FCV的电源似乎没有那么吸引人。与汽车燃料电池的运行不匹配,天然气价格高于商业环境,以及其他因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号