...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Conversion & Management >Hybrid energy systems for off-grid power supply and hydrogen production based on renewable energy: A techno-economic analysis
【24h】

Hybrid energy systems for off-grid power supply and hydrogen production based on renewable energy: A techno-economic analysis

机译:基于可再生能源的离网电力供应和制氢的混合能源系统:技术经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The primary goal of this study is to determine the minimum cost of energy (COE) for five different global locations - Squamish, Canada; Los Angeles and Golden, USA; and Brisbane and Adelaide, Australia - based on renewable energy systems. We do this by investigating power generation and hydrogen production via renewable energy resources (mainly solar and wind) to produce synthetic fuels by capturing CO2 from the atmosphere. Nine different renewable energy systems are considered based on photovoltaic (PV), wind turbines (WT) and combinations thereof, including battery banks and hydrogen technologies. We used the Hybrid Optimization Model for Multiple Energy Resources (HOMER Pro) microgrid software to simulate the optimum size of system components and to identify the cost-effective configurations based on particular locations. When considering minimum COE, the results show that integration of PV, WT, a battery bank, an electrolyser and a hydrogen tank are at 0.50 $/kWh at Golden, Colorado, USA. We also found that without a battery bank, the minimum COE is 0.78 $/kWh at the same location. In this case, the cost increase is due to the capital cost of system components, mainly the hydrogen technologies. The results of this study suggest that hydrogen has economic benefits over batteries for long-term energy storage in off-grid energy systems.
机译:这项研究的主要目标是确定五个不同的全球地点-加拿大斯阔米什(Squamish)的最低能源成本(COE)。美国洛杉矶和戈尔登;以及澳大利亚布里斯班和阿德莱德-基于可再生能源系统。为此,我们调查了可再生能源(主要是太阳能和风能)的发电和制氢,并通过从大气中捕获二氧化碳来生产合成燃料。基于光伏(PV),风力涡轮机(WT)及其组合(包括电池组和氢技术),考虑了九种不同的可再生能源系统。我们使用了多种能源混合优化模型(HOMER Pro)微电网软件来模拟系统组件的最佳尺寸,并根据特定位置确定具有成本效益的配置。当考虑最低COE时,结果表明,美国科罗拉多州戈尔德的PV,WT,电池组,电解槽和氢气罐的集成度为0.50 $ / kWh。我们还发现,在没有电池组的情况下,同一位置的最低COE为0.78 $ / kWh。在这种情况下,成本增加是由于系统组件(主要是氢技术)的资本成本所致。这项研究的结果表明,对于离网能源系统中的长期能量存储而言,氢比电池具有经济优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号