首页> 外文期刊>The Electronic Library >Measurement and analysis of collaboration ability The collaborative rate, collaborative breadth and collaborative depth
【24h】

Measurement and analysis of collaboration ability The collaborative rate, collaborative breadth and collaborative depth

机译:协作能力的度量和分析协作率,协作广度和协作深度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Collaboration is an important way for scientific research. It attracts a large number of researchers, and forms a series of measurement evaluation indicators. The purpose of this study further enriches the evaluation system of collaboration and provides new indicators to measure collaboration ability at author level in order to identify the most appropriate potential partners. Design/methodology/approach - The papers published during the period 2006-2015 and collected from Web of Science Core Collection in library and information science (LIS) are regarded as data source. And it defines and measures the collaborative rate, collaborative breadth and collaborative depth at author level. Findings - The authors' research shows that collaboration is an important way in the scientific research activities in LIS. Unfortunately, most author's collaborative breadth and the collaborative depth are lower than mean. Therefore, the author's scope and stability of collaboration is further strengthened in future. Authors can identify the most appropriate potential partners according to author's research purpose and the region of the collaborative breadth - the collaborative depth. Originality/value - It further enriches the evaluation system of collaboration and provides new indicators to evaluate collaboration ability at author level. Authors can identify the most appropriate potential partners according to author's collaboration ability.
机译:目的-合作是科学研究的重要途径。它吸引了大量的研究人员,并形成了一系列的测量评价指标。这项研究的目的进一步丰富了合作评估系统,并提供了新的指标来衡量作者一级的合作能力,以便确定最合适的潜在合作伙伴。设计/方法/方法-从2006年至2015年期间发表并从Web of Science图书馆和情报学(LIS)核心收藏集中收集的论文被视为数据源。它定义并度量了作者级别的协作率,协作广度和协作深度。调查结果-作者的研究表明,协作是LIS科学研究活动的重要方式。不幸的是,大多数作者的合作广度和合作深度均低于平均水平。因此,作者的合作范围和稳定性将在未来得到进一步加强。作者可以根据作者的研究目的和协作范围(协作深度)来确定最合适的潜在合作伙伴。原创性/价值-它进一步丰富了协作评估系统,并提供了新的指标来评估作者级别的协作能力。作者可以根据其协作能力确定最合适的潜在合作伙伴。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号