首页> 外文期刊>Educational Theory >REFLECTION IN EDUCATION: A KANTIAN EPISTEMOLOGY
【24h】

REFLECTION IN EDUCATION: A KANTIAN EPISTEMOLOGY

机译:在教育中的反思:康德的认识论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As even its defenders admit, reflection in education suffers from a lack of conceptual clarity. In this essay, Henk Procee provides a philosophical analysis of the central concepts in this domain. In the current literature, these concepts are usually taken from the pragmatic school of John Dewey and from critical social theory associated with Juergen Habermas. In contrast, Procee argues that Kant's philosophy incorporates ideas better suited to understanding reflection in education — particularly through his distinction between understanding ("Verstand") and judgment ("Urteilskraft"), a distinction that supports an epistemology that accepts the special nature of reflection as judgment as opposed to formal learning (which, in Kant's analysis, is part of understanding). In addition, Procee discusses some consequences for the aims and methods of reflection in education.
机译:甚至其捍卫者也承认,对教育的反思缺乏概念上的明确性。在本文中,Henk Procee对这一领域的中心概念进行了哲学分析。在当前的文献中,这些概念通常取材于约翰·杜威的务实学派和与尤尔根·哈贝马斯有关的批判社会理论。相比之下,普罗塞认为,康德的哲学包含了更适合理解教育反思的思想,特别是通过他在理解(“ Verstand”)和判断(“ Urteilskraft”)之间的区分,这一区分支持认识论,接受了反思的特殊性质。作为判断而不是形式学习(在康德的分析中,这是理解的一部分)。此外,Procee讨论了对教育反思的目的和方法的一些后果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Theory》 |2006年第3期|p.237-253|共17页
  • 作者

    Henk Procee;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy University of Twente;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号