首页> 外文期刊>Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability >Working with error and uncertainty to increase measurement validity
【24h】

Working with error and uncertainty to increase measurement validity

机译:处理误差和不确定性以提高测量有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the previous two decades, the era of accountability has amplified efforts to measure educational effectiveness more than Edward Thorndike, the father of educational measurement, likely would have imagined. Expressly, the measurement structure for evaluating educational effectiveness continues to rely increasingly on one sole indicator – performance on state-endorsed, large-scaled tests – and the use of these test scores in isolation of other indicators that also capture what it means to be effective. This manuscript describes unresolved questions in educational measurement and provides recommendations to increase measurement validity along both quantitative and qualitative dimensions to move towards a more holistic and appropriate system of measuring educational effectiveness. As Thorndike would have put it, we shall be aided, not hindered, by these tests.
机译:在过去的二十年中,问责制时代比教育测量之父爱德华·索恩代克(Edward Thorndike)想象的要多。明确地说,评估教育效果的衡量结构继续越来越依赖于一个唯一的指标,即国家认可的大规模考试的表现,以及将这些考试分数与其他指标分开使用,这些指标也反映了有效的含义。 。该手稿描述了教育测量中尚未解决的问题,并提供了建议,从数量和质量两方面提高测量的有效性,以朝着更全面,更合适的教育效果测量系统发展。正如Thorndike所说的那样,这些测试将帮助我们,而不是阻碍它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号