...
首页> 外文期刊>Economics of innovation and new technology >CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND THE GOVERNANCE OF KNOWLEDGE: RETHINKING THE RELATIONSHIP IN TERMS OF CORPORATE COHERENCE
【24h】

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND THE GOVERNANCE OF KNOWLEDGE: RETHINKING THE RELATIONSHIP IN TERMS OF CORPORATE COHERENCE

机译:企业治理与知识治理:重新思考企业凝聚力术语之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Corporate governance and the governance of knowledge were for a long time distinct fields of analysis. Reasons for this incompatibility are linked to the restricted vision of corporate governance supported by shareholder value which essentially refers to information rather than knowledge. In this paper, we argue that other visions of corporate governance exist which are also closer to knowledge dynamics and knowledge governance problems. We elaborate thus on the possible reconciliation between corporate governance and the governance of knowledge. We sustain that each key actor (the manager and the investor) embodies a piece of diversified and localized knowledge related to his/her specific domain and field of experience, and these different modules of knowledge have to be recombined by an appropriate mode of corporate governance that stimulates corporate development. In this perspective, the reconciliation really appears essential since managers, by defining and selecting innovative processes, and investors, by determining the money that is invested to sustain these processes, both take part in the creation and governance of new knowledge by the firm. We show that this reconciliation can be based on the notion of corporate coherence of the cognitive firm that allows replacing the conventional conflicting vision of corporate governance by a new vision based on cooperation between managers and investors that collectively contribute to corporate development and coherence.
机译:长期以来,公司治理和知识治理是不同的分析领域。这种不兼容的原因与股东价值支持的公司治理局限性愿景有关,股东价值本质上是指信息而非知识。在本文中,我们认为存在其他公司治理愿景,这些愿景也更接近于知识动态和知识治理问题。因此,我们详细阐述了公司治理与知识治理之间的可能协调。我们坚持认为,每个关键参与者(经理和投资者)都体现了与他/她的特定领域和经验领域相关的多元化和本地化知识,而这些不同的知识模块必须通过适当的公司治理模式进行重组刺激企业发展。从这个角度来看,和解确实显得至关重要,因为经理人(通过定义和选择创新流程)以及投资者(通过确定为维持这些流程而投资的资金)都参与了公司新知识的创造和治理。我们表明,这种和解可以基于认知公司的公司一致性概念,该概念允许通过基于共同促进公司发展和一致性的管理者和投资者之间合作的新视野来取代传统的公司治理冲突构想。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号