首页> 外文学位 >Corporate governance triangle in the post Sarbanes-Oxley period. Attitudes of three anchors: Executive management, independent directors, and long-term pension fund shareholders on issues of corporate governance.
【24h】

Corporate governance triangle in the post Sarbanes-Oxley period. Attitudes of three anchors: Executive management, independent directors, and long-term pension fund shareholders on issues of corporate governance.

机译:Sarbanes-Oxley后时期的公司治理三角。在公司治理问题上,三位主角的态度是:执行管理层,独立董事和长期养老基金股东。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation contrasts the attitudes and beliefs of corporate Chief Executive Officers, Independent Directors, and Public Pension Plan sponsors regarding contemporary issues and proposals to improve corporate governance practices. It examines questionnaire responses to a survey sent to the public pension fund members of the Council of Institutional Investors, and corporations randomly selected from the Standard & Poors 500 and Midcap 400 indexes.; This study examines the effect of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the asset growth of institutional investors on the advocacy of corporate governance reforms. It notes the contemporary corporate governance issues and uses the literature to predict the attitudes of the three anchors viz. CEOs, Independent Directors, and Public Pension Sponsors.; Though there have been studies of CEOs regarding their attitudes on a limited set of corporate governance issues, none has contrasted their attitudes with those of board members and institutional shareholders in the post Sarbanes-Oxley period.; Twenty-seven hypotheses are tested using nonparametric statistical techniques. A total of 156 (15.6%) responses were received. The response rate from Pension funds, CEOs, and Chairs of Audit Committees was 36.3%, 14%, and 11.8% respectively. The inclusion of open-ended questions provides an opportunity for readers to gain additional insights into the data.; Results indicate lower level of receptivity from independent directors to corporate governance proposals than was anticipated. In fact, in the governance triangle, the independent directors were far closer in their views to the CEOs than to the public pension sponsors. This divergence was further confirmed by the difference in their opinions about the important issues that they anticipate to handle in the next five years.
机译:本文对比了公司首席执行官,独立董事和公共养老金计划发起人在当代问题和改善公司治理实践的建议方面的态度和信念。它审查了对发给机构投资者理事会公共养老基金成员以及从标准普尔500指数和中型股400指数中随机选择的公司的调查问卷的答复。本研究考察了2002年《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》的影响以及机构投资者的资产增长对倡导公司治理改革的影响。它指出了当代公司治理问题,并使用文献来预测三个锚点的态度。 CEO,独立董事和公共养老金发起人。尽管已经对首席执行官在有限的公司治理问题上的态度进行了研究,但是没有人将他们的态度与萨班斯-奥克斯利时代后时期的董事会成员和机构股东的态度进行对比。使用非参数统计技术检验了27个假设。总共收到156(15.6%)个答复。养老基金,首席执行官和审计委员会主席的回应率分别为36.3%,14%和11.8%。开放性问题的纳入为读者提供了机会,以获取对数据的更多见解。结果表明,独立董事对公司治理建议的接受程度低于预期。实际上,在治理三角中,独立董事对首席执行官的看法比对公共养老金发起人的看法更为接近。他们对未来五年将要处理的重要问题的意见分歧进一步证实了这种分歧。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bedi, Rahul.;

  • 作者单位

    Touro University International.;

  • 授予单位 Touro University International.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Economics Finance.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 374 p.
  • 总页数 374
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;财政、金融;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号