...
首页> 外文期刊>npj Science of Food >Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security
【24h】

Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security

机译:生物能源对食用素质对食品安全性的影响的系统综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Achieving food security is a critical challenge of the Anthropocene that may conflict with environmental and societal goals such as increased energy access. The “fuel versus food” debate coupled with climate mitigation efforts has given rise to next-generation biofuels. Findings of this systematic review indicate just over half of the studies (56% of 224 publications) reported a negative impact of bioenergy production on food security. However, no relationship was found between bioenergy feedstocks that are edible versus inedible and food security (P value?=?0.15). A strong relationship was found between bioenergy and type of food security parameter (P value??0.001), sociodemographic index of study location (P value?=?0.001), spatial scale (P value??0.001), and temporal scale (P value?=?0.017). Programs and policies focused on bioenergy and climate mitigation should monitor multiple food security parameters at various scales over the long term toward achieving diverse sustainability goals.
机译:实现粮食安全是人类人类可能与环境和社会目标相互冲突的关键挑战,例如增加能源进入。与气候缓解努力相加的“燃料与食物”辩论引起了下一代生物燃料。该系统审查的调查结果表明,仅仅一半的研究(56%的出版物的56%)报告了生物能源生产对粮食安全的负面影响。然而,无能为力与食物安全性和食物安全性的生物能量原料之间没有任何关系(P值?=?0.15)。生物能源和食物安全参数的类型(P值Δ0.001),研究位置的社会阶段指数(P值?= 0.001),空间刻度(P值θ≤0.001)之间存在强烈的关系时间标度(P值?= 0.017)。专注于生物能源和气候缓解的计划和政策应长期监控各种尺度的多种粮食安全参数,以实现各种可持续性目标。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号