首页> 外文期刊>Asian spine journal. >The Influence of Posture on Instability Evaluation Using Flexion–Extension X-Ray Imaging in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
【24h】

The Influence of Posture on Instability Evaluation Using Flexion–Extension X-Ray Imaging in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

机译:腰部脊髓脊髓晶体屈曲X射线成像姿势对不稳定性评价的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Design Prospective clinical study. Purpose To determine the optimal posture for instability evaluation using flexion–extension X-ray imaging in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Overview of Literature Currently, flexion–extension X-ray imaging is the most practical approach for the evaluation of lumbar instability. In flexion–extension X-ray imaging, achievement of the greatest segmental motion with flexion–extension movement is necessary. However, to our knowledge, currently, there is no standardized posture for determining lumbar instability. Methods Twenty-three individuals with lumbar spondylosis related to the fourth vertebra underwent flexion–extension X-ray imaging in different postures (standing, sitting, and lateral decubitus positions), lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and low back pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) evaluation on the same day. Intervertebral angle, percent slippage, and intervertebral disc area ratio for different postures during flexion and extension were compared using Tukey’s method. The effect of low back pain and the association between MRI facet effusion and these measurements were investigated according to posture. Results The percent slippage during extension ( p =0.036), change in the percent slippage between flexion and extension ( p =0.004), and change in the intervertebral angle ( p =0.042) were significantly different between the sitting and lateral decubitus positions. There were also significant differences between the standing and lateral decubitus positions in the change in intervertebral angle ( p =0.010). In patients with VAS score 40, there were significant differences in the intervertebral angle ( p =0.011) between the standing and lateral decubitus positions, percent slippage ( p =0.048), and intervertebral disk ratio ( p =0.008) between the sitting and lateral decubitus positions. We found no relationship between MRI facet effusion and posture in terms of instability. Conclusions In this study, intervertebral instability was best evaluated in the lateral decubitus position when using flexion–extension X-ray imaging for patients with fourth lumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis.
机译:研究设计前瞻性临床研究。目的,用于确定腰椎肺泡患者屈曲延伸X射线成像的不稳定评价的最佳姿势。文献概述目前,屈曲 - 延伸X射线成像是评估腰部不稳定性的最实用方法。在屈曲 - 延伸X射线成像中,需要实现具有屈曲 - 延伸运动的最大分段运动。然而,对于我们的知识目前,没有标准化的姿势来确定腰椎不稳定。方法用腰椎脊髓胸苷的二十三种椎骨脊髓型接受屈曲 - 延伸X射线成像不同姿势(静态,坐着,侧褥疮位置),腰部磁共振成像(MRI),低疼痛视觉模拟等级(VAS)在同一天评估。使用Tukey的方法比较弯曲和延伸期间不同姿势的椎间角,百分比和椎间盘面积比。根据姿势,研究了低腰部疼痛和MRI刻面积分与这些测量之间的关联的影响。结果延伸期间滑动百分比(P = 0.036),屈曲和延伸之间的滑动百分比(P = 0.004)变化,并且在坐姿和横向褥疮位置之间的椎间角(P = 0.042)的变化显着差异。在椎间角变化中,常设和横向褥疮位置之间存在显着差异(P = 0.010)。在VAS得分中的患者中,站立和横向褥疮位置之间的椎角(P = 0.011)差异显着差异,坐姿之间的偏移(P = 0.048)和椎间盘比(P = 0.008)之间和横向褥疮位置。在不稳定方面,我们发现MRI Facet积分与姿势之间没有关系。结论在本研究中,当使用第四腰椎脊髓脊髓型患者的屈曲 - 延伸X射线成像时,在横向褥疮位置最佳地评估椎间不稳定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号