首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >The Impact of Prior Trial Experience on Mock Jurors’ Note Taking During Trials and Recall of Trial Evidence
【24h】

The Impact of Prior Trial Experience on Mock Jurors’ Note Taking During Trials and Recall of Trial Evidence

机译:先前的试验经验对模拟陪审员在试验期间采取审议和回忆审查证据的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Although jurors’ recall of trial evidence is often incomplete and inaccurate, courts rely on jurors’ ability to remember trial evidence to reach just verdicts. Note taking has been found to enhance jurors’ memory of trial evidence. However, the impact of serving on multiple trials on juror note taking and recall has not been examined. Findings from the educational literature demonstrate that students who are more experienced at note taking will take more notes and recall more lecture material. Thus, the current study is the first to investigate if similar benefits are obtained in jurors. Sixty participants attended two experimental sessions and acted as mock jurors. In each session, they watched one of two trial videos, a criminal and a civil trial (order of trials was counterbalanced). All jurors were permitted to take notes whilst watching the trials. Lastly, they were asked to reach a verdict and recall as much trial evidence as they could remember (none of the jurors had access to their notes during the recall task). Jurors wrote down more correct and critical evidence during the second session when compared to the first session. However, there was no statistically significant difference between session one and session two with regards to the quantity of correct and critical evidence jurors recalled. Thus, the present study demonstrates that trial experience enhances mock jurors’ note taking, however, there is no additional enhancement regarding recall.
机译:虽然陪审员召回试验证据往往是不完整和不准确的,但法院依靠陪审员记住判决判决的试验证据的能力。请注意,已发现提高陪审员的试验证据记忆。然而,尚未检查在陪审员票据采取和召回的多次试验上的影响。来自教育文学的调查结果表明,在注释的情况下更有经验的学生将采取更多的备注并回忆更多的讲座材料。因此,目前的研究是第一个调查陪审员中获得类似益处的研究。六十名参与者参加了两个实验课程,并作为嘲弄陪审员。在每个会议中,他们观看了两种试验中的一个,犯罪和民事审判(审判的顺序是平衡的)。允许所有陪审员在观看审判时进行笔记。最后,他们被要求判决判决并回忆起尽可能多的试验证据(没有任何陪审员在召回任务期间访问他们的笔记)。与第一届会议相比,陪审员在第二届会议期间写下了更正和严重的证据。然而,关于召回的正确和严重证据陪审员的数量,会议与第一个和第两个人之间没有统计学意义的差异。因此,本研究表明,试验经验增强了嘲弄陪审员的注意事项,但是,召回没有额外的增强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号