首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >A comparative evaluation of medicine package inserts for oral antidiabetic agents in Palestine
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of medicine package inserts for oral antidiabetic agents in Palestine

机译:巴勒斯坦口腔抗糖尿病药物药物包装的比较评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Patient package inserts (PPIs) should provide accurate, sufficient, and clear information for patients as well as health care professionals. The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare the PPIs of local and imported anti-diabetic agents in the Palestinian market. Eighteen leaflets were collected and analysed based on the completeness of 31 criteria using a scoring method, then the quantity of information was assessed by applying word counting of 17 headings and subheadings. Statistical comparisons of the word count for all products were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test with mean ranks. Then the mean ranks for differences in word counts were adjusted to calculate the fold-difference statistic by dividing the higher mean rank by the lower mean rank. In general, the PPIs of imported agents scored better than local PPIs, but none of the inserts fulfilled the whole criteria. Thirteen out of thirty-one criteria were available in all products. None of these agents had provided any information about duration of use, instructions to convert tablets into liquids forms, pharmacokinetics, or shelf life. Moreover, mechanism of action and maximum dose were deficient in all local PPIs (0.0%), while they were included in 37.5 and 62.5% of imported PPIs, respectively. Furthermore, 90.0% of local PPIs lacked information about drug dose, 80.0% didn't mention any instructions regarding effects on ability to drive or possibility of tablet splitting, and 60.0% didn't involve orders about possibility of tablet crushing. Local PPIs provided inadequate and less detailed instructions regarding many aspects, since the estimated mean rank of local and imported PPIs demonstrated a range of difference from 1.04-fold for missing dose to 2.64-fold for warning and precautions. Significant differences were being identified, with excellence being assigned to imported PPIs. So, it is worth suggesting some necessary modifications in PPI topography and sequence structure of local diabetic agents. Experts in Palestinian Ministry of Health should implement regulatory guidelines to improve the quality and quantity of information provided by local PPIs. This optimisation could become a step forward toward optimal health practice in our society.
机译:患者包装插入(PPI)应为患者以及医疗保健专业人员提供准确,充分和清晰的信息。本研究的目标是评估和比较巴勒斯坦市场中当地和进口抗糖尿病药剂的PPI。基于31标准的完整性收集和分析了十八叶,通过得分方法,通过应用17个标题和副标题的单词计数来评估信息量。使用曼诺 - 惠特尼用平均级别进行统计比较所有产品的数量比较。然后调整单词计数的差异的平均级别以通过将更高的平均等级划分为较高平均等级来计算折叠差异统计。通常,进口剂的PPI比局部PPI更好地得分,但没有一个插入件符合整个标准。所有产品中有三十一条标准的十三个标准。这些代理商没有提供有关使用时间的任何信息,将片剂转化为液体形式,药代动力学或保质期。此外,所有局部PPI(0.0%)的作用机制和最大剂量缺乏,同时分别包含在37.5%和62.5%的进口PPI中。此外,90.0%的局部PPI缺乏有关药物剂量的信息,80.0%没有提及有关推动或平板电脑分裂的可能性的影响的任何指示,60.0%并不涉及有关平板电脑压碎的可能性的订单。由于估计的局部和进口PPI的平均等级,本地PPI提供了不充分且较差的有关许多方面的说明,因此缺失剂量为1.04倍的差异范围为2.64倍以供警告和预防措施。正在确定显着差异,卓越被分配到进口的PPI。因此,值得暗示PPI地形和局部糖尿病药剂的序列结构的一些必要修饰。巴勒斯坦卫生部的专家应实施监管准则,以提高当地PPI提供的信息的质量和数量。这种优化可能成为我们社会最佳健康实践的一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号