首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Implementation of the Good School Toolkit in Uganda: a quantitative process evaluation of a successful violence prevention program
【24h】

Implementation of the Good School Toolkit in Uganda: a quantitative process evaluation of a successful violence prevention program

机译:乌干达的良好学校工具包的实施:成功的暴力预防计划的定量过程评估

获取原文
           

摘要

The Good School Toolkit, a complex behavioural intervention designed by Raising Voices a Ugandan NGO, reduced past week physical violence from school staff to primary students by an average of 42% in a recent randomised controlled trial. This process evaluation quantitatively examines what was implemented across the twenty-one intervention schools, variations in school prevalence of violence after the intervention, factors that influence exposure to the intervention and factors associated with students’ experience of physical violence from staff at study endline. Implementation measures were captured prospectively in the twenty-one intervention schools over four school terms from 2012 to 2014 and Toolkit exposure captured in the student (n?=?1921) and staff (n?=?286) endline cross-sectional surveys in 2014. Implementation measures and the prevalence of violence are summarised across schools and are assessed for correlation using Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient. Regression models are used to explore individual factors associated with Toolkit exposure and with physical violence at endline. School prevalence of past week physical violence from staff against students ranged from 7% to 65% across schools at endline. Schools with higher mean levels of teacher Toolkit exposure had larger decreases in violence during the study. Students in schools categorised as implementing a ‘low’ number of program school-led activities reported less exposure to the Toolkit. Higher student Toolkit exposure was associated with decreased odds of experiencing physical violence from staff (OR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.67-0.86, p-value
机译:良好的学校工具包,通过筹集乌干达非政府组织的复杂行为干预,将过去一周的职业暴力降低到小学生到小学生的平均在最近的随机对照试验中平均42%。该过程评估量化地审查了二十一点干预学校的实施情况,干预后暴力事件普遍存在的变化,影响与学习终点的工作人员身体暴力有关的干预和因素影响的因素。从2012年到2014年到2014年的二十一所学校的干预学校捕获实施措施,并在学生中捕获的工具包暴露(N?= 1921)和工作人员(N?=?286)终结横断面调查。跨学校总结了实施措施和暴力普遍存在,并使用Spearman等级相关系数进行评估。回归模型用于探索与工具包接触相关的单个因素,并在终点上具有物理暴力。过去一周过去一周的普遍性,终身副人员的身体暴力范围从终局的学校的7%到65%。学校的学校均高于教师工具包曝光,在研究期间暴力的暴力较大。学校的学生分类为实施“低”的程序学校主导活动报告的工具包的曝光率较少。更高的学生工具包曝光与员工体育暴力的可能性降低有关(或:0.76,95%CI:0.67-0.86,P值<0.001)。女孩们,报告较差的心理健康和较低等级的学生的学生较少暴露于工具包。干预后,在调整个人工具包曝光后,有些学生仍然增加了从工作人员体验暴力的风险,包括女孩,报告较差的心理健康,经历其他暴力的学生以及自我保健的报告难度的学生。我们的结果表明,增加学生和教师在学校内的良好学校工具包的风险有可能导致暴力进一步减少。通过进一步定位和支持教师与脑神经健康困难的学生的参与,可以增加工具包的有效性。该试验在2012年8月24日,NCT01678846上注册了Clinicaltrial.gov。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号