...
首页> 外文期刊>Translational psychiatry. >The effects of deep-brain non-stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis
【24h】

The effects of deep-brain non-stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis

机译:深脑非刺激在重症强迫症中的影响:个体患者数据META分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Non-intervention-related effects have long been recognized in an array of medical interventions, to which surgical procedures like deep-brain stimulation are no exception. While the existence of placebo and micro-lesion effects has been convincingly demonstrated in DBS for major depression and Parkinson's disease, systematic investigations for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are currently lacking. We therefore undertook an individual patient data meta-analysis with the aim of quantifying the effect of DBS for severe, treatment-resistant OCD that is not due to the electrical stimulation of brain tissue. The MEDLINE/PubMed database was searched for double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trials published in English between 1998 and 2018. Individual patient data was obtained from the original authors and combined in a meta-analysis. We assessed differences from baseline in obsessive-compulsive symptoms following sham treatment, as measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Four studies met the inclusion criteria, randomizing 49 patients to two periods of active or sham stimulation. To preclude confounding by period effects, our estimate was based only on data from those patients who underwent sham stimulation first (n?=?24). We found that sham stimulation induced a significant change in the Y-BOCS score (t?=?-3.15, P??0.005), lowering it by 4.9?±?1.6 points [95% CI?=?(-8.0, -1.8)]. We conclude that non-stimulation-related effects of DBS exist also in OCD. The identification of the factors determining the magnitude and occurrence of these effects will help to design strategies that will ultimately lead to a betterment of future randomized clinical trials.
机译:与非干预相关的效果长期以来在一系列医疗干预措施中得到了认可,如深脑刺激等手术程序也不例外。虽然安慰剂和微病变效应的存在令人信服地证明了在DBS进行重大抑郁和帕金森病,目前缺乏对强迫症(OCD)的系统调查。因此,我们进行了个体患者数据META分析,目的是量化DBS对严重治疗抗性OCD的效果,这不是由于脑组织的电刺激。 Medline / PubMed数据库被搜查为1998年至2018年间英语发布的双盲,假控的随机临床试验。从原作者获得个体患者数据并在META分析中组合。通过耶鲁棕色强迫尺度(Y-BOCs)来测量,我们评估了在假治疗后的强迫症状中与基线的差异。四项研究符合纳入标准,将49例患者随机化至两个活跃或假刺激。为了排除期间的效果,我们的估算只有基于那些患者首先进行假刺激的患者的数据(n?=?24)。我们发现假刺激诱导Y-BOCS评分的显着变化(T?=? - 3.15,P?<0.005),将其降低4.9?±1.6点[95%ci?=?( - 8.0, -1.8)]。我们得出结论,DB的非刺激相关效应也存在于OCD中。确定决定这些效果的幅度和发生的因素将有助于设计最终会导致未来随机化临床试验的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号