...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >Development, Reliability, and Validity of the“Knowledge-Attitude-Practice” Questionnaire of Foreigners on Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment
【24h】

Development, Reliability, and Validity of the“Knowledge-Attitude-Practice” Questionnaire of Foreigners on Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment

机译:“知识态度实践”对外国人调查问卷的发展,可靠性和有效性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective. To develop a “knowledge-attitude-practice” questionnaire as an evaluating tool of foreigners’ cognition on TCM treatment, so as to promote the internationalization of TCM. Methods. The questionnaire was based on the “knowledge-attitude-practice” model and adjusted by expert consultation using the Delphi method. After conducting a survey among foreigners, Cronbach’s α and exploratory factor analysis were used to test the internal consistency reliability and structural validity of the questionnaire, respectively. Results. A total of 10 experts participated in two rounds of expert consultation. The recovery rates of two rounds of expert consultation form were 100.0%. The coefficient authority in two rounds of expert consultation was 0.87 and 0.88, respectively. The concentration of expert opinions in the knowledge, attitude, and practice dimensions was 3.80 to 4.70 points, 3.70 to 4.50 points, and 3.60 to 4.40 points, respectively, in the first round and 4.30 to 4.80 points, 4.10 to 4.60 points, and 4.00 to 4.50 points, respectively, in the second round. The coefficient of variation in the knowledge, attitude, and practice dimensions was 0.10–0.32, 0.16–0.29, and 0.19–0.35, respectively, in the first round and 0.09–0.19, 0.15–0.25, and 0.16–0.31, respectively, in the second round. The W value and significance test x2 in the first round were 0.657 and 218.620 while those in the second round were 0.671 and 181.181P0.001. 8 items were deleted and 1 item was added, and other reserved items were modified according to the statistical analysis results of evaluation items and expert suggestions after the first round and there were no changes after the second round. The revised questionnaire includes three dimensions of knowledge, attitude, and practice, with a total of 30 items. After translating the questionnaire into English, it was conducted in 176 foreigners. Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total questionnaire, knowledge dimension, attitude dimension, and practice dimension was 0.908, 0.781, 0.823, and 0.918, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 factors with a cumulative contribution of 54.090%. After testing reliability and validity, 1 item was deleted, leaving 29 items. Conclusions. After two rounds of expert consultation based on the Delphi method, the results of expert authority, expert coordination, and expert opinions’ concentration were promising, and the expert consultation results were reliable. The “knowledge-attitude-practice” questionnaire of foreigners on TCM treatment in English had good reliability and validity and can evaluate foreigners’ cognition on TCM treatment.
机译:客观的。制定“知识态度实践”调查问卷作为外国人认知对中医治疗的评估工具,以促进中医的国际化。方法。调查问卷是基于“知识态度实践”模型,并通过使用Delphi方法进行专家咨询调整。在外国人进行调查后,Cronbach的α和探索性因子分析分别用于测试问卷的内部一致性可靠性和结构有效性。结果。共有10项专家参加了两轮专家咨询。两轮专家咨询表的恢复利率为100.0%。两轮专家咨询中的系数权限分别为0.87和0.88。在知识,态度和实践方面的专家意见的集中程度为3.80%至4.70点,3.70至4.50点,分别为3.60至4.40点,在第一轮和4.30点至4.80点至4.80点,4.10至4.60点,4.0点至4.00点在第二轮分别为4.50点。知识,姿态和实践尺寸的变化系数分别为0.10-0.32,0.16-0.29和0.19-0.35,分别在第一个圆形和0.09-0.19,0.15-0.25和0.16-0.31中,第二轮。第一轮中的W值和意义测试X2为0.657和218.620,而第二轮中的那些为0.671和181.181p <0.001。 8项被删除,并加入了1个项目,并根据第一个轮换后的评估项目和专家建议的统计分析结果进行修改其他预留项目,第二轮后没有变化。修订后的调查问卷包括知识,态度和实践的三个维度,共有30个项目。在将问卷转化为英语后,它是在176名外国人进行的。 Cronbach的α系数分别为CroseNaire,知识尺寸,姿态尺寸和实践尺寸分别为0.908,0.781,0.823和0.918。探索性因子分析提取了3个因素,累计贡献为54.090%。在测试可靠性和有效性之后,删除了1项,留下29项。结论。经过两轮专家咨询,基于Delphi方法,专家权力,专家协调和专家意见的集中成果承诺,专家咨询结果可靠。英语中医治疗的“知识态度实践”问卷有良好的可靠性和有效性,可以评估外国人对中医治疗的认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号