首页> 外文学位 >Reliability and validity of a treatment outcome satisfaction questionnaire for patients with low back pain (LBP).
【24h】

Reliability and validity of a treatment outcome satisfaction questionnaire for patients with low back pain (LBP).

机译:下腰痛(LBP)患者治疗效果满意度问卷的信度和效度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study is to define what treatment outcome satisfaction (TOS) means for the patient with low back pain (LBP) and to develop a theoretically-based, valid and reliable measure to assess this construct in a physical therapy setting. Two preliminary studies were conducted to provide support for the main study: (1) An explorative study that examined the concept of TOS at the end of a physical therapy (PT) intervention, and (2) A cross-sectional study that evaluated the content, face validity, and internal consistency of a TOS questionnaire (TOSQ).;Methods. A longitudinal study established construct validity by evaluating the content, convergent, and discriminate validity of a TOSQ. Data were collected using three methods: written, phone, and proxy.;Results. An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis detected one factor that accounted for 58% to 78% of the total variance in the multidimensional questionnaire depending on the method of data collection (written, phone, or proxy). All of the items highly and significantly correlated with each other and with the global measures of satisfaction, demonstrating good internal consistency and concurrent validity. Cronbach's alpha (alpha) values were calculated to find the most homogenous set of items. The highest alpha and average inter-item correlation in all of the cases was found when eight items were included. Criterion validity was supported by the strong correlations between each of the specific items and the two global items, and the significant association between the total score of the TOSQ and these global questions. Convergent validity was established as TOS was associated with the theoretical models of performance, expectation/disconfirmation, and embodiment. Discriminate validity was suggested by the low associations with process and structure of care satisfaction. Results remained similar for all methods of data collection.;Conclusions. TOS was found to be a complex attitude reflected in the patient's beliefs, emotional responses, and behavioral reactions resulting from the physical therapy (PT) intervention. Construct validity of the TOSQ was proven through content, face, criterion, convergent, and discriminant validity. This research project was successful in developing a valid TOSQ for patients with LBP in a PT setting.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定对于腰背痛(LBP)的患者而言,治疗结果满意度(TOS)意味着什么,并开发一种基于理论的,有效和可靠的方法来评估物理治疗环境中的这种结构。进行了两项初步研究以为主要研究提供支持:(1)一项探索性研究,在物理治疗(PT)干预结束时检查了TOS的概念,以及(2)一项评估该研究内容的横断面研究,面孔有效性和TOS调查表(TOSQ)的内部一致性。一项纵向研究通过评估TOSQ的内容,收敛和区分有效性来建立构造效度。数据使用三种方法收集:书面,电话和代理。结果。探索性和确认性因素分析检测到一个因素,该因素占多维调查表中总方差的58%至78%,具体取决于数据收集的方法(书面,电话或代理)。所有项目彼此之间以及与整体满意度之间的相关性非常高且显着,显示出良好的内部一致性和并发有效性。计算克伦巴赫(Cronbach)的alpha(alpha)值以找到最均匀的项目集。当包括八个项目时,在所有情况下都发现了最高的alpha和平均项目间相关性。每个特定项目与两个全局项目之间的强相关性,以及TOSQ的总分与这些全局问题之间的显着关联,支持了标准有效性。由于TOS与绩效,期望/不确定性和体现的理论模型相关联,因此建立了收敛效度。与护理满意度的过程和结构的低关联性表明了区分效度。所有数据收集方法的结果仍然相似。发现TOS是一种复杂的态度,反映在患者的信念,情绪反应和物理疗法(PT)干预导致的行为反应中。 TOSQ的构造效度已通过内容,面貌,标准,收敛性和判别效度证明。该研究项目成功地为PT环境中的LBP患者开发了有效的TOSQ。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lis, Angela.;

  • 作者单位

    New York University.;

  • 授予单位 New York University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Occupational Health and Safety.;Health Sciences Rehabilitation and Therapy.;Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 337 p.
  • 总页数 337
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号