...
首页> 外文期刊>Informing science: The international journal of an emerging transdiscipline >Design Science Research in Practice: What Can We Learn from a Longitudinal Analysis of the Development of Published Artifacts?
【24h】

Design Science Research in Practice: What Can We Learn from a Longitudinal Analysis of the Development of Published Artifacts?

机译:实践设计科学研究:我们可以从纵向分析出版文物的发展中学习什么?

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim/Purpose: To discuss the Design Science Research approach by comparing some of its canons with observed practices in projects in which it is applied, in order to understand and structure it better. Background: Recent criticisms of the application of the Design Science Research (DSR) approach have pointed out the need to make it more approachable and less confusing to overcome deficiencies such as the unrealistic evaluation. Methodology: We identified and analyzed 92 articles that presented artifacts developed from DSR projects and another 60 articles with preceding or subsequent actions associated with these 92 projects. We applied the content analysis technique to these 152 articles, enabling the preparation of network diagrams and an analysis of the longitudinal evolution of these projects in terms of activities performed and the types of artifacts involved. Contribution: The content analysis of these 152 articles enabled the preparation of network diagrams and an analysis of the longitudinal evolution of these projects in terms of the activities and types of artifacts involved. Evidence was found of a precedence hierarchy among different types of artifacts, as well as nine new opportunities for entry points for the continuity of DSR studies. Only 14% of the DSR artifacts underwent an evaluation by typical end users, characterizing a tenth type of entry point. Regarding the evaluation process, four aspects were identified, which demonstrated that 86% of DSR artifact evaluations are unrealistic. Findings: We identified and defined a set of attributes that allows a better characterization and structuring of the artifact evaluation process. Analyzing the field data, we inferred a precedence hierarchy for different artifacts types, as well as nine new opportunities for entry points for the continuity of DSR studies. Recommendation for Researchers: The four attributes identified for analyzing evaluation processes serve as guidelines for practitioners and researchers to achieve a realistic evaluation of artifacts. Future Research: The nine new entry points identified serve as an inspiration for researchers to give continuity to DSR projects.
机译:目标/目的:讨论其在应用中的项目中的观察到实践中的一些规范的设计科学研究方法,以便更好地理解和结构。背景:最近对设计科学研究的应用(DSR)方法的批评已经指出,需要使其更加平衡,令人困惑地克服不切实际的评估等缺陷。方法论:我们确定并分析了92篇文章,这些文章提出了从DSR项目开发的文物,另外60篇文章与与这些92个项目相关的前后或后续行动。我们将内容分析技术应用于这152篇文章,从而制定网络图以及对所涉及的活动和所涉及的伪影类型的这些项目的纵向演进。贡献:这152篇文章的内容分析使得在涉及的伪影的活动和类型方面,对这些项目的纵向演变进行了网络图和分析。在不同类型的工件中发现了一种优先的等级的证据,以及DSR研究连续性的入学点的九个新机会。只有14%的DSR工件通过典型的最终用户进行了评估,表征了第十类入口点。关于评估过程,确定了四个方面,证明了86%的DSR工件评估是不现实的。调查结果:我们识别并定义了一组属性,其允许更好的表征和结构化伪影评估过程。分析现场数据,我们推断出不同的工件类型的优先层次结构,以及九个进入点的新机会,用于DSR研究的连续性。研究人员的建议:用于分析评估流程的四个属性作为从业者和研究人员的指导方针,以实现文物的现实评估。未来的研究:确定的九个新的入口点作为研究人员提供对DSR项目的连续性的灵感来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号