首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and pain medicine. >Comparison of chemical pregnancy rates according to the anesthetic method during ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization: a retrospective study
【24h】

Comparison of chemical pregnancy rates according to the anesthetic method during ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization: a retrospective study

机译:在体外施肥中进行超声引导的经阴道卵母细胞检索期间化学妊娠率的比较:回顾性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Oocyte retrieval is the most important procedure in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Various anesthetic methods are used to control a patient’s anxiety and pain during IVF; however, there are no recommended anesthetic methods at present. In this study, we retrospectively investigated chemical pregnancy rates according to the anesthetic method used for oocyte retrieval. Methods We reviewed records of patients who underwent oocyte retrieval between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. Patients were divided into the spinal anesthesia (SA) and monitored anesthesia care (MAC) groups. The primary outcome was chemical pregnancy rate after IVF. Results The study included 95 patients. SA was administered in 77 (81%) and MAC in 18 (19%). The overall chemical pregnancy rate was 32.6% (31/95). According to the anesthetic method, the pregnancy rate was 32.5% (25/77) in the SA group and 33.3% (6/18) in the MAC group. There was no statistical difference in the pregnancy rate between the groups (P = 0.575). The procedural time was significantly shorter in the SA group than in the MAC group (P 0.001). Conclusions Chemical pregnancy rates were not significantly different between the SA and MAC groups. However, the procedure duration was shorter in the SA group than in the MAC group.
机译:背景技术Oocyte检索是体外施肥中最重要的方法(IVF)。各种麻醉方法用于控制IVF期间患者的焦虑和疼痛;但是,目前没有推荐的麻醉方法。在这项研究中,我们回顾性地根据用于卵母线检索的麻醉方法来研究化学妊娠速率。方法审查了2012年1月1日至2017年12月31日之间接受卵母线的患者的记录。患者分为脊髓麻醉(SA)和监测麻醉护理(MAC)组。 IVF后的主要结果是化学妊娠率。结果该研究包括95名患者。 SA在18(19%)的77(81%)和Mac中施用。整体化学妊娠率为32.6%(31/95)。根据麻醉方法,妊娠率为32.5%(25/77),在MAC组中,33.3%(6/18)。组之间的妊娠率没有统计学差异(p = 0.575)。在SA组中的程序时间比MAC组更短(P <0.001)。结论SA和MAC组之间的化学妊娠率没有显着差异。但是,SA组的过程持续时间比MAC组更短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号