首页> 外文期刊>Chiropractic and Manual Therapies >Attitudes to functional neurology and some other ‘prescriptive’ chiropractic techniques and their associations with chiropractic conservatism: a cross-sectional survey of chiropractic students
【24h】

Attitudes to functional neurology and some other ‘prescriptive’ chiropractic techniques and their associations with chiropractic conservatism: a cross-sectional survey of chiropractic students

机译:对脊椎按摩保健的功能性神经学和一些其他“规范”脊椎按摩术技术的态度:脊椎按摩术学生的横断面调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Chiropractic technique systems (‘prescriptive’ techniques) might be interpreted as helpful guidelines. However, ‘prescriptive’ techniques, such as Functional Neurology (FN), Sacro-Occipital Technique, and Applied Kinesiology are more concerned with the ‘technical’ diagnosis than the condition and its symptoms and, thus, seem to provide easy solutions. In a voluntary anonymous questionnaire survey carried out late 2017, we explored interest in ‘prescriptive’ techniques, particularly FN, among French chiropractic students in grades 3–6, and the possible link with chiropractic conservatism. We investigated their: i) attitudes to the use of ‘prescriptive’ techniques, ii) awareness of FN, and iii) attitudes to FN. Further, if their attitudes to some conservative chiropractic concepts influenced their clinical approach on iv) some ‘prescriptive’ chiropractic techniques and v) attitudes to FN. Data reported in tables illustrated the prevalence of the use of ‘prescriptive’ techniques, awareness of FN, and positive attitude to FN (i.e. interest in and acceptance of). Students were given a FN score based on five questions on their interest in and acceptance of FN (0 to 5), dichotomized into two groups: ‘not positive attitude’ (0 to 1) and ‘positive attitude’ (2 to 5). Chiropractic conservatism was graded from 1 to 4. Associations were tested between conservatism groups and i) interest in ‘prescriptive’ techniques and ii) FN attitudes groups. The response rate was 67% (N?=?359), of which 90% were positive toward ‘prescriptive’ techniques. Only 10% had never heard about FN and in the 6th year all had heard about it. Only a minority, unrelated to the year of study, approved of the two examples given of FN concepts. Nevertheless, a majority were positive towards FN, more so in the higher grades. Students with the most conservative beliefs were 17 times more likely to want to use ‘prescriptive’ techniques and 11 times more likely to have a higher FN score. Although not taught in the curriculum, these students were attracted to ‘prescriptive’ techniques including FN, particularly in the higher grades. Curiously, despite this interest they do not generally agree with some key concepts within FN.
机译:脊椎按摩术技术系统(“规范性”技术)可能被解释为有用的指导方针。然而,“规定性”技术,如功能性神经学(FN),骶圆形技术和应用运动学更涉及的“技术”诊断而不是条件及其症状,因此似乎提供了简单的解决方案。在2017年底进行的一项自愿匿名问卷调查中,我们探讨了3-6级的法国脊椎按摩师的“规范性”技术,特别是FN的兴趣,以及与脊椎按摩助性保守主义的可能联系。我们调查了他们的:i)态度与“规范性”技术,ii)意识到FN的认识和III)的态度。此外,如果他们对某些保守脊椎按摩术概念的态度影响了IV的临床方法)一些“规范性”脊椎按摩术技术和v)态度至FN。表中报告的数据说明了使用“规范性”技术,对Fn的认识和对Fn的积极态度的流行(即兴趣和接受)。学生获得了FN分数,根据其兴趣和接受FN(0至5),分为两组的五个问题:“不是积极态度”(0到1)和“积极态度”(2比5)。脊椎按摩术保守主义从1到4分层分级。在保守主义团体和I)之间的关联对“规范性”技术和II)FN态度组进行了影响。响应率为67%(n?=?359),其中90%朝向“规范性”技术阳性。只有10%从未听说过FN,在第6年里,所有人都听说过。只有少数群体,与学习年度无关,批准了给予FN概念的两个例子。然而,大多数人对FN的积极态度,更高等级更为正。具有最保守的信仰的学生可能想要使用“规范性”技术的可能性是17倍,并且有11倍可能获得更高的FN得分。虽然没有在课程中授课,但这些学生被吸引到“规范性”技术,包括FN,特别是在较高的等级中。奇怪的是,尽管这种兴趣,但他们通常不同意FN内的一些关键概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号