首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >The application of heterogeneous cluster grouping to reflective writing for medical humanities literature study to enhance students’ empathy, critical thinking, and reflective writing
【24h】

The application of heterogeneous cluster grouping to reflective writing for medical humanities literature study to enhance students’ empathy, critical thinking, and reflective writing

机译:异质集群分组在医学人文文学研究中反思写作的应用,提升学生的同理心,批判性思维与反思写作

获取原文
           

摘要

Background To facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration and to make connections between patients’ diseases and their social/cultural contexts, the study examined whether the use of heterogeneous cluster grouping in reflective writing for medical humanities literature acquisition could have positive effects on medical university students in terms of empathy, critical thinking, and reflective writing. Methods A 15-week quasi-experimental design was conducted to investigate the learning outcomes. After conducting cluster algorithms, heterogeneous learning clusters (experimental group; n =?43) and non-heterogeneous learning clusters (control group; n =?43) were derived for a medical humanities literature study. Before and after the intervention, an Empathy Scale in Patient Care (ES-PC), a critical thinking disposition assessment (CTDA-R), and a reflective writing test were administered to both groups. Results The findings showed that on the empathy scale, significant differences in the “behavioral empathy,” “affective empathy,” and overall sections existed between the post-test mean scores of the experimental group and those of the control group, but such differences did not exist in “intelligent empathy.” Regarding critical thinking, there were significant differences in “systematicity and analyticity,” “skepticism and well-informed,” “maturity and skepticism,” and overall sections. As for reflective writing, significant differences existed in “ideas,” “voice and point of view,” “critical thinking and representation,” “depth of reflection on personal growth,” and overall sections, but not in “focus and context structure” and “language and conventions.” Conclusion This study outlined an alternative for using heterogeneous cluster grouping in reflective writing about medical humanities literature to facilitate interdisciplinary cooperation to provide more humanizing medical care.
机译:背景技术促进跨学科合作并在患者疾病与社会/文化背景之间进行联系,研究检测了在医疗人文文献采集中反思写作中的异质集群分组的使用是否可能对医疗大学生在同理心中具有积极影响批判性思维和反思写作。方法进行15周的准实验设计以调查学习结果。在进行聚类算法之后,由于医学人文文献研究得出,异构学习簇(实验组; n =Δ33)和非异构学习簇(对照组; n =Δ33)。在干预之前和之后,患者护理(ES-PC),临界思维分化评估(CTDA-R)和反射写入测试的同情标度被施用于两组。结果表明表明,在实验组后试验均分数和对照组的后测试平均分子之间存在显着差异,“行为移情”,“情感移情”,“情感移情”和整体部分存在显着差异,但这种差异不存在于“智能的同理心”中。关于批判性思维,“系统性和分析性”的“怀疑主义和知情”,“成熟度和怀疑”和总体部分存在显着差异。至于反思写作,“思想”中存在显着差异“的语音和观点”,“批判性思维和代表”,“个人成长的深度”和整体部分,但不在“焦点和情境结构”中和“语言和惯例”。结论本研究概述了在医疗人文文学中反思写作中使用异质集群分组,以促进跨学科合作,提供更多人性化医疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号