...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >The role of mediation in solving medical disputes in China
【24h】

The role of mediation in solving medical disputes in China

机译:调解在中国求解纠纷中的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Medical litigation represents a growing cost to healthcare systems. Mediation, arbitration, and other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods are increasingly used to help solve the disputes and improve healthcare satisfaction. In China, the increasing number of medical disputes has contributed to concern for the safety of physicians and mistrust between physician and patients resulting in ADR processes being established in several provinces in recent years. Our aim was to describe and explain the impact of this new mediation process in the Chinese healthcare system. Our study investigated mediation practices in China using case-level data from 5614 mediation records in Guangdong Province between 2013 and 2015. We investigated how the resolution success as well as the compensations are associated with the case characteristics using regression analysis. Among the cases analyzed, 1995 (41%) were solved with agreement through mediation, 1030 were closed by reconciliation, 559 were closed by referring to court and 1017 cases were withdrawn after mediation. Five hundred five Yinao cases were solved with the help of mediators on the spot. We find that mediation solved about 90% of medical disputes under present mechanisms, while more police support is needed to cope with Yinao. The average compensation of mediation is CNY60,200 and average length of mediation is 87?days. Longer time taken to reach resolution and more money claimed by patients are associated with lower resolution success rate (p??0.01) and higher compensation levels (p??0.01). Our results show the performance of mediation mechanisms in China to help solve medical disputes. ADR plays a role in reducing the need for initiating litigation and may ultimately increase satisfaction with the healthcare system.
机译:医疗诉讼代表了医疗保健系统的成本不断增长。调解,仲裁和其他替代争议解决(ADR)方法越来越多地用于帮助解决纠纷并提高医疗保健满足。在中国,越来越多的医疗纠纷为近年来近年来若要在几个省份建立的医生和患者之间的安全性和患者之间的安全性和不信任的担忧。我们的目标是描述和解释这一新调解过程对中国医疗保健系统的影响。我们的研究在2013年和2015年之间使用了来自广东省5614个调解记录的案例级数据调查了调解实践。我们调查了使用回归分析的案例特征如何取得决议的成功以及补偿。在分析的情况下,1995年(41%)通过调解协议解决,1030次通过和解关闭,559通过提及法院,调解后撤回1017个案件。在现场介质的帮助下解决了五百五个Yinao案例。我们发现调解在目前的机制下解决了大约90%的医疗纠纷,而需要更多的警察支持来应付yinao。调解的平均补偿为CNY60,200,平均调解长度为87.天。达到解决方案的时间较长时间和患者声称的更多钱与分辨率较低的成功率(P?<0.01)和更高的补偿水平有关(P?<?0.01)。我们的结果表明,中国中介机制的表现,有助于解决医疗纠纷。 ADR在减少对启动诉讼的需求方面发挥作用,最终可能会增加与医疗保健系统的满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号