首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Are performance indicators used for hospital quality management: a qualitative interview study amongst health professionals and quality managers in The Netherlands
【24h】

Are performance indicators used for hospital quality management: a qualitative interview study amongst health professionals and quality managers in The Netherlands

机译:是用于医院质量管理的表现指标:荷兰卫生专业人士和优质经理之间的定性面试学习

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Hospitals are under increasing pressure to share indicator-based performance information. These indicators can also serve as a means to promote quality improvement and boost hospital performance. Our aim was to explore hospitals’ use of performance indicators for internal quality management activities. Methods We conducted a qualitative interview study among 72 health professionals and quality managers in 14 acute care hospitals in The Netherlands. Concentrating on orthopaedic and oncology departments, our goal was to gain insight into data collection and use of performance indicators for two conditions: knee and hip replacement surgery and breast cancer surgery. The semi-structured interviews were recorded and summarised. Based on the data, themes were synthesised and the analyses were executed systematically by two analysts independently. The findings were validated through comparison. Results The hospitals we investigated collect data for performance indicators in different ways. Similarly, these hospitals have different ways of using such data to support their quality management, while some do not seem to use the data for this purpose at all. Factors like ‘linking pin champions’, pro-active quality managers and engaged medical specialists seem to make a difference. In addition, a comprehensive hospital data infrastructure with electronic patient records and robust data collection software appears to be a prerequisite to produce reliable external performance indicators for internal quality improvement. Conclusions Hospitals often fail to use performance indicators as a means to support internal quality management. Such data, then, are not used to its full potential. Hospitals are recommended to focus their human resource policy on ‘linking pin champions’, the engagement of professionals and a pro-active quality manager, and to invest in a comprehensive data infrastructure. Furthermore, the differences in data collection processes between Dutch hospitals make it difficult to draw comparisons between outcomes of performance indicators.
机译:背景医院正在增加压力,以共享基于指标的绩效信息。这些指标还可以作为促进质量改善和促进医院性能的手段。我们的目标是探索医院的绩效指标以获得内部质量管理活动。方法我们在荷兰14个急性护理医院的72名卫生专业人士和优质管理人员中进行了定性访谈研究。专注于骨科和肿瘤科,我们的目标是深入了解数据收集和使用性能指标的两个条件:膝关节和髋关节置换手术和乳腺癌手术。录制和总结了半结构化访谈。基于数据,合成主题,分析由两个分析师独立执行。通过比较验证了调查结果。结果医院我们调查了以不同方式收集绩效指标的数据。同样,这些医院有不同的方式使用此类数据来支持其质量管理,而有些人似乎并不似乎为此目的使用数据。像“联系PIN冠军”,“主动质量管理人员”等因素似乎有所作为。此外,具有电子患者记录和强大的数据收集软件的全面医院数据基础设施似乎是生产可靠的外部性能指标以进行内部质量改进的先决条件。结论医院经常无法使用绩效指标作为支持内部质量管理的手段。然后,这些数据不习惯它的全部潜力。建议医院将他们的人力资源政策集中在“联系PIN冠军冠军”,参与专业人员和一个积极的质量经理,并投资全面的数据基础设施。此外,荷兰医院之间数据收集过程的差异使得绩效指标结果之间难以比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号