...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation >Hop tests and psychological PROs provide a demanding and clinician-friendly RTS assessment of patients after ACL reconstruction, a registry study
【24h】

Hop tests and psychological PROs provide a demanding and clinician-friendly RTS assessment of patients after ACL reconstruction, a registry study

机译:跳跃试验和心理专业专业提供了一项苛刻和临床医生友好的RTS评估ACL重建后的患者,注册表研究

获取原文
           

摘要

There is growing interest in assessing psychological well-being in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It is unknown whether an assessment of psychological outcome in addition to tests of muscle function can facilitate decisions on return to sport (RTS). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate passing rates in different physical RTS test batteries, with and without the inclusion of psychological outcome measures 1?year after ACL reconstruction. In this cross-sectional cohort study a total of 320 patients (51% men) aged 18–65?years were included 1?year after ACL reconstruction. Passing rates on different muscle function (MF) test batteries (with results presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)), consisting of knee extension and flexion strength tests, 3 hop tests, and 2 psychological patient-reported outcomes (PROs); Quality of Life subscale from the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS QoL) and ACL Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), were evaluated 1?year after ACL reconstruction. Muscle function test batteries comprised: 2 MF tests (vertical hop and hop for distance; pass?=?90% LSI); 2 MF tests and 2 PRO (pass?=?90% LSI, 62.5 points on KOOS QoL and 76.6 points on ACL-RSI), 5 MF tests (2 strength and 3 hop tests, pass?=?90% LSI), and 5 MF tests and 2 PRO (pass?=?90% LSI, 62.5 points on KOOS QoL and 76.6 points on ACL-RSI). Passing rates in the different test batteries were 47% for 2 MF tests, 19% for 2 MF tests and 2 PROs, 29% for 5 MF tests and 13% for 5 MF tests and 2 PROs. The use of psychological PROs together with tests of muscle function gave the lowest passing rate (13%). There was a very strong correlation between passing 2 hop tests and 2 PROs and passing 5 MF tests (rΦ?=?0.41) as well as passing 5 MF tests and 2 PROs (rΦ?=?0.79). The use of hop tests together with psychological PROs provides a clinician-friendly RTS test battery for assessment 1?year after ACL reconstruction as the passing rate was 19% when using 2 hop-tests combined with 2 PROs, compared with 29% when using 5 tests of MF requiring advanced testing equipment.
机译:在前令韧带(ACL)重建后,对患者评估心理福祉的兴趣日益增长。目前尚不清楚对肌肉功能的测试外,对心理结果进行评估是否可以促进关于返回运动(RTS)的决定。因此,本研究的目的是评估不同的物理RTS测试电池中的通过率,随着ACL重建后的1次含有心理结果措施1?在这种横断面队列中,共有320名患者(51%的男性)18-65岁?岁月包括1?ACL重建后一年。通过不同肌肉功能(MF)测试电池(具有肢体对称指数(LSI)的结果),包括膝关节延伸和屈曲强度试验,3跳测试和2个心理患者报告的结果(专业人士);从膝关节损伤和骨关节炎的生活质量分类(KOOS QOL)和ACL在受伤后返回运动(ACL-RSI),评估1?ACL重建后一年。肌肉功能测试电池组成:2 MF测试(垂直跳和距离;通过?=?90%LSI); 2 MF测试和2 pro(通过?=?90%LSI,KOOS QOL上的62.5点和ACL-RSI的76.6点),5 MF测试(2个强度和3跳测试,通过?= 90%LSI),以及5 MF测试和2 pro(通过?=?90%LSI,在KOOS QoL上的62.5点和ACL-RSI上的76.6点)。在不同的测试电池中通过率为2 MF试验47%,2 MF试验和2种优点的19%,5 MF检验29%,5 MF试验和2个专业人员的13%。与肌肉功能的测试一起使用心理职业,给出了最低的通过率(13%)。通过2跳测试和2个优点和通过5MF测试(Rφ= 0.41)以及通过5MF测试和2个优点之间存在非常强烈的相关性,以及通过(Rφ≤x≤0.79)。使用Hop测试与心理专业人员一起提供临床医生友好的RTS测试电池,用于评估1?ACL重建后的一年,因为使用2轴试验与2个专业人员合并时,与2个专业人员相比,5需要高级测试设备的MF的测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号