...
首页> 外文期刊>Biology Direct >The common ancestry of life
【24h】

The common ancestry of life

机译:生活中的共同祖先

获取原文
           

摘要

Background It is common belief that all cellular life forms on earth have a common origin. This view is supported by the universality of the genetic code and the universal conservation of multiple genes, particularly those that encode key components of the translation system. A remarkable recent study claims to provide a formal, homology independent test of the Universal Common Ancestry hypothesis by comparing the ability of a common-ancestry model and a multiple-ancestry model to predict sequences of universally conserved proteins. Results We devised a computational experiment on a concatenated alignment of universally conserved proteins which shows that the purported demonstration of the universal common ancestry is a trivial consequence of significant sequence similarity between the analyzed proteins. The nature and origin of this similarity are irrelevant for the prediction of "common ancestry" of by the model-comparison approach. Thus, homology (common origin) of the compared proteins remains an inference from sequence similarity rather than an independent property demonstrated by the likelihood analysis. Conclusion A formal demonstration of the Universal Common Ancestry hypothesis has not been achieved and is unlikely to be feasible in principle. Nevertheless, the evidence in support of this hypothesis provided by comparative genomics is overwhelming. Reviewers this article was reviewed by William Martin, Ivan Iossifov (nominated by Andrey Rzhetsky) and Arcady Mushegian. For the complete reviews, see the Reviewers' Report section.
机译:背景技术常见的信念是地球上的所有细胞生命形式都有共同的起源。该视图得到了遗传码的普遍性和多种基因的普遍保护的支持,特别是那些编码翻译系统的关键组件的普遍节约。最近的一项卓越的研究声称通过比较共同的祖先模型和多祖先模型来预测普遍保守蛋白的序列来提供普遍共同的祖先假设的正式,同源性独立测试。结果我们设计了普遍保守蛋白的连接对准的计算实验,表明普通普通血症的声称示范是分析的蛋白质之间显着序列相似性的差异。这种相似性的性质和起源是对模型 - 比较方法的“共同血统”的预测无关紧要。因此,比较蛋白的同源性(共同原点)仍然是序列相似性的推断,而不是通过似然分析证明的独立性质。结论普遍共同的祖先假设的正式示范尚未实现,并原则上不可能是可行的。然而,支持对比较基因组学提供的这一假设提供的证据是压倒性的。审稿人通过威廉马丁,Ivan Iossifov(Andrey Rzhetsky)和Arcady Mushegian提名)审核。有关完整的评论,请参阅“审阅者的报告”部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号