首页> 外文期刊>Procedia Computer Science >Systems Approach to the Development and Application of Technical Metrics to Systems Engineering Projects
【24h】

Systems Approach to the Development and Application of Technical Metrics to Systems Engineering Projects

机译:系统工程项目技术指标开发和应用的系统方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Thales UK employs around 3,000 engineers, over half of which are systems engineers, delivering solutions from transport systems and secure transactions to integrated communications, naval sensors, and air defense systems. The Systems Engineering (SE) function within Thales UK seeks to minimize the impact of, or eliminate problematic SE projects. Here, problematic projects are defined as ones where the SE group on a project was expected to deliver certain characteristics against cost/time constraints arising from the problem context, however the project did not, or will not meet expectations by a significant margin. A traditional view is that the impact to the Company of problematic projects can be minimized by early detection and subsequent intervention by SE leadership. As such, Thales UK seeks to implement an approach that will alert SE staff and leadership to the presence or development of problematic projects, such that appropriate interventions can be made.Literature regarding SE technical metrics explores the development, and less frequently, the use of metrics to provide information to project teams to support judgments about current versus desirable positions. No literature has been identified that describes how SE technical metrics could be used en-masse to provide insight in to the performance of a diverse portfolio of SE projects. Thales UK has mandated the collection of a set of SE technical metrics on all SE projects, and understands that the reported data requires interpretation and relation to context. The context of each project is different and dynamic. This presents a challenge when attempting to use this data to draw conclusions regarding the health of all projects across an enterprise, and the health of the operation of an entire engineering function.This paper describes a quasi-experiment with SE leaders and project technical metrics from a range of domains within Thales UK to test whether expert judgment can determine if a project is problematic or not from metric data alone. A separate research activity is then presented which moves toward a theory of how a metrics approach could be structured for use across a diverse range of SE projects to detect characteristics of problematic projects.
机译:泰雷兹英国公司雇用大约3,000名工程师,其中一半以上是系统工程师,负责提供从运输系统和安全交易到集成通信,海军传感器和防空系统的解决方案。 Thales UK的系统工程(SE)功能旨在最大程度地减少影响或消除有问题的SE项目。在这里,有问题的项目被定义为这样一个项目,即一个项目的SE小组有望针对由问题环境引起的成本/时间约束而提供某些特性,但是该项目没有达到或将无法达到预期的水平。传统观点认为,可以通过及早发现并随后由SE领导进行干预,将问题项目对公司的影响降至最低。因此,泰雷兹英国公司寻求采用一种方法来警告SE员工和领导者存在问题的项目或开发存在问题的项目,以便可以进行适当的干预。为项目团队提供信息以支持有关当前职位与理想职位的判断的指标。尚未找到任何文献描述如何将SE技术指标用于大规模使用,以深入了解SE项目的各种投资组合的绩效。泰雷兹英国已授权在所有SE项目中收集一套SE技术指标,并了解报告的数据需要解释并与环境相关。每个项目的上下文都是不同的,并且是动态的。这在尝试使用这些数据得出有关企业中所有项目的运行状况以及整个工程功能的运行状况的结论时提出了挑战。本文介绍了SE负责人和项目技术指标的准实验英国Thales范围内的一系列领域,以测试专家的判断是否可以仅从度量标准数据确定项目是否有问题。然后提出了一个单独的研究活动,该活动朝着如何构造度量方法的理论发展,以用于各种SE项目中以检测有问题的项目的特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号