...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Differences in perceived fairness and health outcomes in two injury compensation systems: a comparative study
【24h】

Differences in perceived fairness and health outcomes in two injury compensation systems: a comparative study

机译:两种伤害补偿系统在感知公平性和健康结果方面的差异:一项比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Involvement in a compensation process following a motor vehicle collision is consistently associated with worse health status but the reasons underlying this are unclear. Some compensation systems are hypothesised to be more stressful than others. In particular, fault-based compensation systems are considered to be more adversarial than no-fault systems and associated with poorer recovery. This study compares the perceived fairness and recovery of claimants in the fault-based compensation system in New South Wales (NSW) to the no-fault system in Victoria, Australia. Methods One hundred eighty two participants were recruited via claims databases of the compensation system regulators in Victoria and NSW. Participants were?>?18?years old and involved in a transport injury compensation process. The crash occurred 12?months ( n =?95) or 24?months ago ( n =?87). Perceived fairness about the compensation process was measured by items derived from a validated organisational justice questionnaire. Health outcome was measured by the initial question of the Short Form Health Survey. Results In Victoria, 84?% of the participants considered the claims process fair, compared to 46?% of NSW participants (χ2?=?28.54; p Conclusion The study shows large differences in perceived fairness between two different compensation systems and an association between fairness and health. These findings are politically important because compensation processes are designed to improve recovery. Lower perceived fairness in NSW may have been caused by potential adversarial aspects of the scheme, such as liability assessment, medical assessments, dealing with a third party for-profit insurance agency, or financial insecurity due to lump sum payments at settlement. This study should encourage an evidence informed discussion about how to reduce anti-therapeutic aspects in the compensation process in order to improve the injured person’s health.
机译:背景技术在机动车碰撞之后参与补偿过程始终与较差的健康状况相关联,但是其原因尚不清楚。假设某些补偿系统比其他系统更具压力。特别是,基于故障的补偿系统被认为比无故障系统更具对抗性,并且与较差的恢复能力相关。这项研究将新南威尔士州基于过错的赔偿制度与澳大利亚维多利亚州的无过错制度中索赔人认为的公平性和追偿权进行了比较。方法通过维多利亚州和新南威尔士州的赔偿系统监管者的索赔数据库,招募了一百八十二名参与者。参与者年龄在18岁以上,并参与了运输伤害赔偿程序。崩溃发生在12个月(n =?95)或24个月前(n =?87)。关于薪酬程序的公平感是通过从经过验证的组织公正性调查表中得出的项目来衡量的。健康结果是通过简式健康调查的最初问题来衡量的。结果在维多利亚州,有84%的参与者认为索赔过程公平,而新州的参与者有46%的受访者认为(χ 2 ?=?28.54; p结论研究表明,两者之间的感知公平性差异很大两种不同的补偿制度以及公平与健康之间的联系。这些发现在政治上很重要,因为补偿程序旨在提高恢复能力。新南威尔士州较低的公平感可能是由该计划的潜在对抗性方面引起的,例如责任评估,医疗评估,与第三方营利性保险公司打交道或由于结算时一次性付款而造成的财务不安全,这项研究应鼓励就如何减少赔偿过程中的抗治疗措施以改善受伤者的病情提供有据可依的讨论。健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号