首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Vascular Diagnostics and Interventions >The increasing role of duplex scanning in the follow-up after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
【24h】

The increasing role of duplex scanning in the follow-up after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

机译:双重扫描在腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后随访中的作用日益增强

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: To analyze the results of a follow-up program after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) mainly based on duplex ultrasound (DUS) examinations.Materials and methods: The postoperative surveillance program changed over the time. In recent years (2007-2012) we are used to performing a DUS and an angio-CT scan within one month after EVAR, a DUS at 6 and 12 months and every 6 months thereafter (Group 2, 498 interventions). Data were compared with our historical series (2000-2006; Group 1, 345 interventions.) Perioperative results were recorded. The long-term results were analysed by Kaplan-Meier curves.Results: The rates of perioperative mortality were 1.1% and 1.2% respectively (P=0.9). The cumulative rates of perioperative complications were 16% and 6.5%, respectively (P=0.001). The rate of reinterventions at 60 months was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (29.1% and 20.1% respectively, P=0.03, log rank 4.6). Also the 5-year rate of endoleak was significantly greater in group 2 than group 1 (43.3% and 34.5% respectively, P<0.001, log rank 13.4); however, the rate of endoleaks requiring a redo procedure was lower in group 2 (35/163, 21.5%) than in group 1 (51/108, 47%; P<0.001).Conclusion: Data from our study confirm that a DUS-based follow-up program in patients undergoing EVAR is equally sensitive in identifying endoleaks to the CT scan-based program used in past years.
机译:目的:分析以双超声(DUS)检查为基础的腹主动脉瘤(EVAR)血管内修复术后随访方案的结果。材料与方法:术后监测方案随时间变化。近年来(2007-2012年),我们习惯于在EVAR后1个月内进行DUS和血管CT扫描,在6和12个月后进行DUS,之后每6个月进行一次(第2组,498项干预措施)。将数据与我们的历史系列(2000-2006年;第1组,345项干预措施)进行了比较。记录了围手术期的结果。通过Kaplan-Meier曲线分析长期结果。结果:围手术期死亡率分别为1.1%和1.2%(P = 0.9)。围手术期并发症的累积发生率分别为16%和6.5%(P = 0.001)。第2组在60个月时的再干预率显着高于第1组(分别为29.1%和20.1%,P = 0.03,对数秩为4.6)。另外,第2组的5年内漏率显着高于第1组(分别为43.3%和34.5%,P <0.001,对数等级13.4)。但是,需要重做程序的内漏率在第2组(35 / 163,21.5%)低于第1组(51 / 108,47%; P <0.001)。结论:我们的研究数据证实了DUS在接受EVAR的患者中进行的基于随访的程序对识别过去几年基于CT扫描的程序的内漏同样敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号