【24h】

Les Medicaments et la Sante Publique

机译:药物与公共卫生

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The impact of the type of drug plan on adherence to and cost of antihypertensive medications within the context of a universal drug insurance program is not known.Objective: To compare patient’s adherence to and cost of antihypertensive medications between adult patients with public and private drug insurance in the province of Quebec, Canada.Methods: A matched retrospective cohort was reconstructed from the linkage of the Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ) and reMed databases between March 2008 and May 2010. The cohort included 186 privately and 1,747 publicly-insured patients aged 18-64 years who were treated with one or two antihypertensive medications. Adherence was measured with the proportion of days covered (PDC) over one year. Cost of antihypertensive medications included the cost of the medication, the mark-up and the dispensing fees. Linear regression models were used to estimate the adjusted mean difference of the PDC and the monthly cost per patient for antihypertensive therapy between the two groups. In addition, the cost for 30-day prescriptions for the entire class, sub-classes and eachantihypertensive medication was compared between patients with private and public insurance with T-tests.Results: More than 70% of patients were 50-64 years, 90% were prevalent users of antihypertensive medications, and 90% of the publicly and 72% of the privately insured patients had only one antihypertensive medication at cohort entry. The mean PDC was 90.3% for privately and 94.0% for publicly-insured patients with one antihypertensive medication at cohort entry. Corresponding figures were 92.9% and 80.7% for patients with two antihypertensive medications. For new users, the mean PDC was 58.8% for privately and 65.0% for publicly-insured patients with one antihypertensive medication atcohort entry. The average monthly cost per patient for antihypertensive medications was $41.52 in the private and $32.21 in the public group. Using 30-day prescriptions only, the average cost for the entire class, each sub-class and for individual antihypertensive medications was higher for privately-insured than publicly-insured patients except for labetalol (beta blocker) and triamterene (diuretic).Conclusion: The cost of antihypertensive medications was 29% higher for patients with private drug insurance, although adherence was high among prevalent users and similar between the two groups. Regulation of dispensing fees on the public side and the high percentage of prevalent users in both groups may explain the results.
机译:背景:在普遍药物保险计划的背景下,药物计划的类型对降压药物依从性和费用的影响尚不清楚。目的:比较公共和私人成年患者之间患者对降压药物的依从性和费用方法:从2008年3月至2010年5月期间,魁北克Régiede l'assurance maladie duQuébec(RAMQ)和reMed数据库之间的联系重建了匹配的回顾性队列。该队列包括186个私人1,747名年龄在18-64岁之间的公共保险患者,他们接受了一种或两种降压药的治疗。坚持性是根据一年中的覆盖天数(PDC)来衡量的。降压药物的成本包括药物成本,加价和配药费用。线性回归模型用于估计两组之间PDC的调整均值差和每位患者降压治疗的每月费用。此外,使用T检验比较了私人和公共保险患者的全班,次班和每种降压药物30天处方的费用。结果:超过70%的患者年龄在50-64岁之间,90 %的人是抗高血压药物的普遍使用者,并且90%的公共保险患者和72%的私人保险患者在队列进入时仅服用一种抗高血压药物。私人进入队列时,私人使用PDC的平均比例为90.3%,公共保险患者的平均PDC为94.0%。两种降压药的患者的相应数字分别为92.9%和80.7%。对于新用户,私人患者的平均PDC为58.8%,公共保险患者在参加一项降压药物治疗时的平均PDC为65.0%。私人患者每人平均每月降压药物费用为41.52美元,公共团体为32.21美元。仅使用30天的处方,除拉贝洛尔(β受体阻滞剂)和氨苯蝶啶(利尿剂)以外,私人保险的全班,每个子类别和个别降压药的平均费用都比公共保险的患者高。私人药物保险患者的抗高血压药物成本高出29%,尽管在普遍使用者中依从性很高,两组之间相似。监管公共部门的配药费用以及两组中较高比例的普遍用户可以解释这一结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号