...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences >Safety and Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

Safety and Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:膝骨关节炎患者低水平激光治疗的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Low Level Laser Therapy was introduced as an alternative non-invasive treatment for osteoarthritis, but its effectiveness is still controversial. The main objective of this article was to determine the safety and efficacy of LLLT in patients with knee osteoarthritis. In order to gather evidence, main medical databases as well as relevant websites were browsed without time limit. We searched with appropriate keywords and strategies. After quality assessment of studies, study data were extracted by two reviewers. Standard mean difference proposed through Inverse Variance was used in the meta-analysis using the random-effects model. Twelve values were used for the evaluation of heterogeneity. A total of 823 studies, 14 RCTs were selected after final review. There was a signi?cant difference between LLLT and Placebo in pain at rest (p=0.02), pain at activity (p=0.01), total pain (p=0.03), WOMAC function (p=0.01), WOMAC stiffness (p=0.02) and WOMAC total (p&0.0001) in favor of the LLLT. There was no signi?cant difference between LLLT and Placebo in WOMAC pain (p=0.09) and range of motion (p=0.1). In spite of some positive findings, this meta-analysis lacked data on how LLLT effectiveness is affected with important factors: wavelength, energy density, treatment duration, numbers of sessions the treatment, severity of KOA and site of application.
机译:引入低水平激光疗法作为骨关节炎的另一种非侵入性治疗方法,但其有效性仍存在争议。本文的主要目的是确定LLLT在膝骨关节炎患者中的安全性和有效性。为了收集证据,没有时间限制地浏览了主要的医学数据库以及相关的网站。我们搜索了适当的关键字和策略。在对研究质量进行评估后,由两名审稿人提取了研究数据。使用随机效应模型在荟萃分析中使用通过逆方差提出的标准均值差。使用十二个值来评估异质性。最终评估后,总共823项研究选择了14项RCT。 LLLT和安慰剂之间在静止疼痛(p = 0.02),活动疼痛(p = 0.01),总疼痛(p = 0.03),WOMAC功能(p = 0.01),WOMAC刚度(p = 0.02)和WOMAC总数(p <0.0001)支持LLLT。 LLLT和安慰剂在WOMAC疼痛(p = 0.09)和运动范围(p = 0.1)之间没有显着差异。尽管有一些积极的发现,但该荟萃分析缺乏有关LLLT有效性如何受到以下重要因素影响的数据:波长,能量密度,治疗持续时间,疗程数,KOA的严重程度和应用部位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号