首页> 外文期刊>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies >Isaiah 36–39: Rethinking the issues of priority and historical reliability
【24h】

Isaiah 36–39: Rethinking the issues of priority and historical reliability

机译:以赛亚书36-39:重新考虑优先权和历史可靠性的问题

获取原文
           

摘要

Isaiah 36–39 is a coherent literary unity that both holds priority over II Kings 18–20 and reflects a historically reliable interpretation of the events surrounding Sennacherib's invasion. On a literary level, Isaiah 36–39 shows itself to be a vital piece of the overall literary structure of Proto-Isaiah in that it highlights the fulfilment of Isaiah's initial Immanuel prophecy in chapters 7–12. The historical occasion for the writing of Isaiah 36–39 is early on during the reign of Manasseh, when opinion in Judah would have been divided over how to interpret the historical events surrounding Sennacherib's invasion. Isaiah 36–39, therefore, sought to vindicate Hezekiah as a faithful and righteous king, Isaiah as a true prophet and YHWH as the one true God, in contrast to Manasseh's policy changes that clearly reflected his opinion that Hezekiah was a foolish king, Isaiah was a false prophet and YHWH was not powerful enough to protect Judah.
机译:以赛亚书36–39是一个连贯的文学统一体,它比国王18–20都享有优先地位,并且反映了围绕塞纳切里布入侵事件的历史可靠解释。在文学层面上,以赛亚书36-39显示出自己是原始以赛亚书整体文学结构的重要组成部分,因为它突出了以赛亚书第7-12章中最初以马内利预言的实现。以赛亚书36-39的写作的历史性时刻是在玛拿西统治时期的早期,那时犹大的意见在如何解释围绕塞纳切里布入侵的历史事件上会有所分歧。因此,以赛亚书36-39力图证明希西家是一个忠实公义的国王,以赛亚是一个真正的先知,而耶和华则是唯一的真神,这与玛拿西的政策变化形成鲜明对比,后者明确反映了他的观点,即希西家是一个愚蠢的国王以赛亚。是一位虚假的先知,耶和华没有足够的力量来保护犹大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号