...
首页> 外文期刊>Vojnosanitetski Pregled >Could application of epinephrine improve hemostatic efficacy of hemoclips for bleeding peptic ulcers? A prospective randomized study
【24h】

Could application of epinephrine improve hemostatic efficacy of hemoclips for bleeding peptic ulcers? A prospective randomized study

机译:肾上腺素的应用能否提高止血钳对消化性溃疡出血的止血功效?前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/Aim. Bleeding from peptic ulcers can be effectively and safely treated with endoscopic hemoclips therapy. However, due to certain limiting factors of hemoclips, application of combination with another endoscopic method may give better results. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of endoscopic hemoclips therapy and to evaluate potential benefits of this therapy combined with epinephrine in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. Methods. This prospective randomized study included 70 patients with bleeding gastric or duodenal ulcer. In 34 of the patients endoscopic hemoclips therapy was applied (group I), and in 36 of them a combined therapy of hemoclips and epinephrine (group II). Results. Initial hemostasis was achieved in most patients treated with endoscopic hemoclips therapy (94.1%) as well as in the patients treated with combination therapy (97.2%). After initial hemostasis achieved rebleeding occurred in 3 (9.3%) patients treated with hemoclips and in 2 (5.7%) patients treated with combination therapy, but this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The difference in the achieved final hemostasis between the group I (91.1%) and the group II (94.4%) was not statistically significant. Also, the differences between the two groups of patients in the need for blood transfusions, length of hospital stay, need for surgery and mortality were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion. Endoscopic hemoclips therapy is effective and safe in treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. Combination therapy of hemoclips and epinephrine has no advantage over hemoclips monotherapy.
机译:背景/目标。内窥镜止血钳疗法可有效,安全地治疗消化性溃疡出血。然而,由于止血钳的某些限制因素,与另一种内窥镜检查方法联合应用可能会产生更好的结果。这项研究的目的是检查内窥镜止血钳疗法的有效性和安全性,并评估该疗法与肾上腺素联合治疗出血性消化性溃疡的潜在益处。方法。这项前瞻性随机研究包括70例胃或十二指肠溃疡出血患者。在34例患者中应用了内窥镜止血钳疗法(I组),在其中36例中采用了止血钳和肾上腺素的联合疗法(II组)。结果。在接受内窥镜止血钳治疗的大多数患者(94.1%)以及接受联合疗法治疗的患者(97.2%)中均达到了初始止血。达到最初止血后,使用止血夹治疗的3例患者(9.3%)和采用联合疗法治疗的2例(5.7%)患者发生了再出血,但该差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。第一组(91.1%)和第二组(94.4%)之间达到的最终止血差异无统计学意义。另外,两组患者在输血需求,住院时间,手术需求和死亡率方面的差异均无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。结论。内窥镜止血钳治疗出血性消化性溃疡有效且安全。止血钳和肾上腺素的联合治疗没有止血钳单一疗法的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号