首页> 外文期刊>Water >Bioassessment of a Drinking Water Reservoir Using Plankton: High Throughput Sequencing vs. Traditional Morphological Method
【24h】

Bioassessment of a Drinking Water Reservoir Using Plankton: High Throughput Sequencing vs. Traditional Morphological Method

机译:浮游生物对饮用水水库的生物评估:高通量测序与传统形态学方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Drinking water safety is increasingly perceived as one of the top global environmental issues. Plankton has been commonly used as a bioindicator for water quality in lakes and reservoirs. Recently, DNA sequencing technology has been applied to bioassessment. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of the 16S and 18S rRNA high throughput sequencing method (HTS) and the traditional optical microscopy method (TOM) in the bioassessment of drinking water quality. Five stations reflecting different habitats and hydrological conditions in Danjiangkou Reservoir, one of the largest drinking water reservoirs in Asia, were sampled May 2016. Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis showed that plankton assemblages varied among the stations and the spatial patterns revealed by the two methods were consistent. The correlation between TOM and HTS in a symmetric Procrustes analysis was 0.61, revealing overall good concordance between the two methods. Procrustes analysis also showed that site-specific differences between the two methods varied among the stations. Station Heijizui (H), a site heavily influenced by two tributaries, had the largest difference while station Qushou (Q), a confluence site close to the outlet dam, had the smallest difference between the two methods. Our results show that DNA sequencing has the potential to provide consistent identification of taxa, and reliable bioassessment in a long-term biomonitoring and assessment program for drinking water reservoirs.
机译:饮用水安全越来越被认为是全球首要的环境问题之一。浮游生物通常被用作湖泊和水库水质的生物指标。最近,DNA测序技术已应用于生物评估。在这项研究中,我们比较了16S和18S rRNA高通量测序方法(HTS)和传统的光学显微镜方法(TOM)在饮用水质量生物评估中的有效性。于2016年5月对5个反映亚洲最大饮用水源之一的丹江口水库不同生境和水文条件的站点进行了采样。非度量多维标度(NMDS)分析显示,这些站点之间的浮游生物组合各不相同,而且空间格局不同两种方法揭示的结果是一致的。在对称的Procrustes分析中,TOM和HTS之间的相关性为0.61,表明这两种方法之间总体上具有良好的一致性。 Procrustes分析还显示,两种方法之间的站点特定差异在站点之间有所不同。受两个支流影响较大的黑河咀站(H)的差异最大,而靠近出口大坝的汇合站点曲首(Q)的站间差异则最小。我们的结果表明,DNA测序具有潜力,可以在饮用水水库的长期生物监测和评估程序中提供分类单元的一致鉴定和可靠的生物评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号