首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Cardiovascular Research >P Wave Duration And Its Spatial Dispersion In Healthy Subjects
【24h】

P Wave Duration And Its Spatial Dispersion In Healthy Subjects

机译:健康受试者的P波持续时间及其空间色散

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: To establish the normal value of P wave duration and its dispersion on 12-lead body surface ECG in healthy subjects. Methods: 12-lead surface ECGs were obtained from 2078 healthy Chinese subjects aged between 1 and 87 (mean age 39.4±17.3) years. The maximum (Pmax) and minimum P wave duration (Pmin) was measured by a computerized system. The difference between Pmax and Pmin was defined as P wave dispersion (Pd). Results: There was a progressive increase in the mean values of Pmax, Pmin and Pd with age. The average Pmax, Pmin and Pd in all subjects were 109.9±7.9, 81.0±11.4 and 28.9±10.7ms respectively. The values of these parameters in those between 1-14 years were 101.5±9.5, 76.9±10.2 and 24.8±7.5ms respectively (p<0.05). Most Pmax was found in lead II (77.0%) or V5 (14.3%), whereas most Pmin was found in lead V1 (74.7%) or V2 (7.8%). Univariate analysis showed a small but significant correlation between Pman and age (r=0.369, p<0.01) or heart rate (r= -0.322, p<0.01), but revealed no significant correlation between Pd and age or heart rate (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The normal value of Pmax and Pd among healthy Chinese subjects is 96-120ms and 8-50ms respectively. P wave duration is influenced by age and heart rate. Introduction Recent studies have indicated that P wave dispersion (Pd) on body surface ECG predicts the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). 1 The normal values of P duration and P dispersion among Chinese subjects are unknown. The present study reports the methodology and results of Pd measurement in 2,078 healthy Chinese subjects. Materials and Methods SubjectsThe study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of our hospital. Between 1996-1998, 2078 healthy subjects aged between 1-87 (mean age 39.4±17.3, 1,185 males) years were selected for the study. Medical history was obtained and physical examination was performed in all the subjects prior to the enrollment. For those who were 60 years old and over, chest X-ray, echocardiography, blood glucose level and lipids were also tested to exclude any potential cardiovascular disease.The subjects were divided into 7 age groups as below: 1-13 years: 274 (145 males); 14-29 years: 409 (203 males); 30-39 years: 412 (207 males); 40-49 years: 404 (206 males); 50-59 years: 295 (193 males); 60-69 years: 20 (182 males); and >70 years: 54 (49 males).ECG acquisition and analysis12-lead ECG was acquired in all subjects after 15 min rest with a SR-1000A ECG system ((BOAI Medical Electronic Instrument, Guandong, China). The ECG signals of 30s were acquired and stored on the hardware of the data acquisition system. The ECG waves were then displayed on the computer screen, with the waves enlarged by 2-4 times and paper speed increased to 50-100 mm/s.The P wave duration was measured from the beginning to the end of the P wave as described before.1, 2 The maximum and minimum P wave duration (Pmax and Pmin) was measured respectively from three cardiac cycles and the average of the Pmax and Pmin was used as the value of each subject.The difference between Pmax and Pmin was defined as the dispersion of P waves (Pd).Statistical analysisA SPSS/PC software was used for statistical analysis. Data were expressed as means±SD. F test was used to analyze the difference in percentages between groups. Student t test was used for the differences in numerical data between males and females. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was used for the assessment of relationships between age, gender, heart rate (HR) and P wave duration or dispersion. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results The average of Pmax, Pmin and Pd of the 2,078 subjects was 109.9±7.9, 81.0±11.4 ms and 28.9±10.7 respectively. In most subjects Pmax was found in lead II or V5, accounting for 77.0% and 14.4% respectively. Pmin was mainly found in V1 or V2,with an incidence of 74.7% and 7.8% respectively. If confidence level of 97.5% was used, the normal range of Pmax and Pd 96-120ms and 8-50ms re
机译:目的:建立健康受试者的P波持续时间及其在12导联体表心电图上的离散度的正常值。方法:从2078名1至87岁(平均年龄39.4±17.3)岁的健康中国受试者中获得12导联表面心电图。最大(Pmax)和最小P波持续时间(Pmin)由计算机系统测量。将Pmax与Pmin之差定义为P波色散(Pd)。结果:随着年龄的增长,Pmax,Pmin和Pd的平均值逐渐增加。所有受试者的平均Pmax,Pmin和Pd分别为109.9±7.9、81.0±11.4和28.9±10.7ms。这些参数在1-14岁之间的值分别为101.5±9.5、76.9±10.2和24.8±7.5ms(p <0.05)。在铅II(77.0%)或V5(14.3%)中发现大多数Pmax,而在铅V1(74.7%)或V2(7.8%)中发现大多数Pmin。单变量分析显示Pman与年龄(r = 0.369,p <0.01)或心率(r = -0.322,p <0.01)之间存在很小但显着的相关性,但Pd与年龄或心率之间无显着相关性(p> 0.05)。结论:中国健康人群的Pmax和Pd正常值分别为96-120ms和8-50ms。 P波持续时间受年龄和心率影响。引言最近的研究表明,体表ECG上的P波弥散(Pd)可以预测房颤(AF)的风险。 1中国受试者的P持续时间和P离散度的正常值未知。本研究报告了2,078名健康中国受试者中Pd的测量方法和结果。材料和方法受试者该研究已获我院人类伦理委员会批准。在1996年至1998年之间,选择了2078位年龄在1-87岁(平均年龄39.4±17.3岁,男性1,185位)之间的健康受试者作为研究对象。在入组前已获得所有患者的病史并进行了身体检查。对于60岁以上的人群,还进行了胸部X线检查,超声心动图检查,血糖水平和血脂检查,以排除任何潜在的心血管疾病。受试者分为以下7个年龄段:1-13岁:274( 145男); 14-29岁:409(男性203); 30-39岁:412(男性207); 40-49岁:404(206男); 50-59岁:295(193名男性); 60-69岁:20(男性182); 70岁及以上:54名(49名男性)。心电图获取和分析SR-1000A心电图系统(中国广东省BOAI医疗电子仪器)静置15分钟后,所有受试者均获取了12导联心电图。采集30s,并将其存储在数据采集系统的硬件中,然后将ECG波显示在计算机屏幕上,并将其放大2-4倍,并将纸张速度提高至50-100 mm / s。如前所述,从P波的开始到结束进行测量。1、2从三个心动周期分别测量最大和最小P波持续时间(Pmax和Pmin),并将Pmax和Pmin的平均值用作测量值。统计分析采用SPSS / PC软件进行统计分析,数据表示为均值±标准差,采用F检验分析各组受试者的值,Pmax与Pmin之差定义为P波的离散度(Pd)。两组之间的百分比差异。学生t检验是我们ed为男性和女性之间的数值数据差异。单因素和多元回归分析用于评估年龄,性别,心率(HR)与P波持续时间或离散度之间的关系。 P <0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果2078例受试者的Pmax,Pmin和Pd平均值分别为109.9±7.9、81.0±11.4 ms和28.9±10.7。在大多数受试者中,铅II或V5中发现Pmax,分别占77.0%和14.4%。 Pmin主要存在于V1或V2中,发生率分别为74.7%和7.8%。如果使用97.5%的置信度,则Pmax和Pd的正常范围为96-120ms和8-50ms

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号