...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Health >Allergy Workup in Allergic Rhinitis at Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
【24h】

Allergy Workup in Allergic Rhinitis at Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

机译:沙特阿拉伯吉达过敏性鼻炎的过敏检查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Appropriate medical diagnosis and therapy of allergic rhinitis (AR) necessitate the identification of an IgE mediated sensitization to allergen. Objective: To explore the spectrum of allergy investigations in patients with AR. Settings: King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods: This is a prospective cross-sectional study. 41 patients with symptoms and signs compatible with AR examined at ENT clinics were sequentially included. AR diagnosis was confirmed at Allergy clinic by a positive reaction to an in-vivo skin prick test (SPT) to common inhalant allergens (sensitization). AR cases then underwent different in-vitro tests: total peripheral eosinophil count (TPEC), total serum IgE, and specific IgE antibodies to common inhalant allergens by immuno-CAP system (Phadiatop). Results: AR confirmed by positive SPT was detected in 30 cases (73%). Their ages ranged between 16 – 52 years old (mean 27 ±9SD), and females constituted 60%. The predominant allergens were house dust mites (HDMs): Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus 70 % and D. farinae 67%, Cat 33%, Cockroach 33%, Salsola pestifer 23%, and Aspergilus 20%. TPEC ranged 10-1200 cell/mm3 (mean= SD), and eosinophilia (?450 cells/mm3) was found in 23%. Total IgE ranged 8 – 2000 IU/ml (mean= SD), and was elevated (>190 IU/ml) in 47%. Phadiatop was positive in 83% of AR cases. A very significant correlation between SPT and Phadiatop (df=1, P<0.001) was found. Conclusion: The prevalence of sensitization to inhalant allergens, particularly HDMs, by both in-vivo and in-vitro methods was common in AR cases at Jeddah. The presence of eosinophilia and/or high total IgE in the context of compatible clinical findings may help in the diagnosis of AR. This work advocates the importance of allergy workup for allergen sensitization in both AR diagnosis and the subsequent care of patients by promoting avoidance strategies. Introduction Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common health problem for which many patients do not seek appropriate medical care (International 1994, Dywickz 1998, Fuad 2003). World wide, AR may affect 10-30% of the general population (Mygind 1996, Stracan 1997, Bousquet 2001). In a recent survey at Saudi Arabia, the prevalence of chronic rhinitis in children was found as high as 26%, and 62% of them were allergic based on positive skin prick test (SPT) (Sobki 2004). Although AR is not a life-threatening condition in most cases, it has a substantial impact on public health quality and the economy (Malone 1997, Weiss 2001, Sullivan 2001). Globally, these are on the rise today because of the increasing prevalence of allergic conditions and the higher cost of new medications (Tripathi 2001, Bousquet 2003, William 2004).AR is a symptomatic disorder of the nose induced by an immunoglobulin (IgE)-mediated inflammation of the nasal membranes in response to allergen exposure (King 1998, Druce 2003). Allergen exposures result in the bridging of 2 adjacent IgE molecules, leading to the release of preformed mediators from mast cell granules. These mediators (ie, histamine, leukotrienes, kinins) cause early-phase symptoms such as sneezing, rhinorrhea, and congestion. Late-phase reactions begin hours later and are caused by newly formed inflammatory cells (ie, eosinophils), which prolong the earlier reactions and lead to chronic inflammation.The diagnosis of AR is based on the clinical history, physical examination, and allergy workup is used mainly to confirm the presence of IgE mediated hypersensitivity (atopy) (Dykewicz 1998, King 1998, Shaikh 2004). Allergy workup includes a group of in-vitro and in-vivo tests. An elevated peripheral eosinophil count (eosinophilia) has been documented in some patients with AR, but it is less sensitive than nasal eosinophilia (Naclrio 1994, Druce2003, Shaikh 2004). Total serum IgE has been detected in as many as 30-60% of patients with AR (Hendrson 1971, Shaikh 2004). Antigen-specific IgE antibodies are the most important
机译:背景:对变应性鼻炎(AR)进行适当的医学诊断和治疗,需要鉴定IgE介导的对变应原的致敏作用。目的:探讨AR患者的过敏研究范围。地点:沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院(KAUH)。方法:这是一项前瞻性的横断面研究。依次纳入41名在耳鼻喉科诊所检查的症状和体征与AR相符的患者。通过对普通吸入性变应原的体内皮肤点刺试验(SPT)呈阳性反应(敏化),在变态反应诊所确认了AR诊断。然后对AR病例进行不同的体外测试:通过免疫CAP系统(Phadiatop)对外周嗜酸性粒细胞总数(TPEC),总血清IgE和针对常见吸入性变应原的特异性IgE抗体。结果:30例(73%)被SPT阳性证实为AR。他们的年龄介于16至52岁之间(平均27±9SD),女性占60%。主要的过敏原是屋尘螨(HDM):皮肤癣菌70%和粉虱D. farinae 67%,猫33%,蟑螂33%,鼠尾草鼠疫23%和曲霉20%。 TPEC的范围为10-1200细胞/ mm3(平均值= SD),嗜酸性粒细胞增多(?450细胞/ mm3)的比例为23%。总IgE范围为8 – 2000 IU / ml(平均值= SD),并以47%的比例升高(> 190 IU / ml)。在83%的AR患者中,Phadiatop呈阳性。发现SPT与Phadiatop之间存在非常显着的相关性(df = 1,P <0.001)。结论:在吉达的AR患者中,通过体内和体外方法对吸入性过敏原特别是HDM致敏的情况很普遍。在相容的临床发现背景下,嗜酸性粒细胞增多和/或高总IgE的存在可能有助于AR的诊断。这项工作通过提倡避免策略,倡导过敏检查对变应原致敏在AR诊断和患者后续护理中的重要性。简介变应性鼻炎(AR)是一个常见的健康问题,许多患者没有寻求适当的医疗护理(International 1994,Dywickz 1998,Fuad 2003)。在世界范围内,AR可能会影响总人口的10%至30%(Mygind 1996,Stracan 1997,Bousquet 2001)。最近在沙特阿拉伯进行的一项调查显示,儿童慢性鼻炎的患病率高达26%,根据皮肤点刺试验(SPT)阳性,其中62%患有过敏性疾病(Sobki 2004)。尽管在大多数情况下,AR并不是威胁生命的疾病,但它对公共卫生质量和经济具有重大影响(Malone 1997,Weiss 2001,Sullivan 2001)。在全球范围内,由于变应性疾病的患病率增加和新药物的成本增加,这些现象在今天正在增加(Tripathi 2001,Bousquet 2003,William 2004)。AR是由免疫球蛋白(IgE)诱发的鼻部症状性疾病,介导的过敏原暴露引起的鼻膜炎症(King 1998,Druce 2003)。过敏原暴露导致2个相邻的IgE分子桥接,导致肥大细胞颗粒释放预先形成的介质。这些介体(即组胺,白三烯,激肽)会引起早期症状,例如打喷嚏,鼻漏和充血。晚期反应开始于数小时后,是由新形成的炎症细胞(即嗜酸性粒细胞)引起的,这些炎症细胞延长了较早的反应并导致了慢性炎症。AR的诊断基于临床病史,体格检查和过敏检查主要用于确认是否存在IgE介导的超敏反应(原子型)(Dykewicz 1998,King 1998,Shaikh 2004)。过敏检查包括一组体外和体内测试。据报道,某些AR患者外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数(嗜酸性粒细胞增多)升高,但其敏感性不如鼻嗜酸性粒细胞升高(Naclrio 1994,Druce2003,Shaikh 2004)。在多达30-60%的AR患者中检测到总血清IgE(Hendrson 1971,Shaikh 2004)。抗原特异性IgE抗体是最重要的

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号