【24h】

Isolation and insight: practical pillars of revalidation?

机译:隔离和洞察力:重新验证的实用支柱?

获取原文
           

摘要

The imminent introduction of revalidation, ‘the process by which doctors will, in future, demonstrate to the General Medical Council (GMC) on a regular basis that they remain up to date and fit to practise’,1 obliges us to ask what guiding principles should be addressed as we implement revalidation? Seven years ago Good Medical Practice (GMP) for GPs stated, ‘the unacceptable GP has little knowledge of developments in clinical practice; has limited insight into the current state of his or her knowledge or performance; selects educational opportunities which do not reflect his or her learning needs; does not audit care in his or her practice, or does not feed it back into practice,’ and ‘is hostile to external audit or advice.’2,3
机译:重新验证即将到来,“医生日后将定期向通用医学委员会(GMC)证明他们保持最新状态并适合实践的过程”,1使我们不得不问什么指导原则在实施重新验证时应该解决?七年前,全科医生的良好医疗规范(GMP)表示:“不可接受的全科医生对临床实践的发展知之甚少;对他或她的知识或表现的当前状态了解有限;选择不反映其学习需求的教育机会;不对自己的执业情况进行审核,或者不将其反馈给实践,并且“对外部审核或建议持敌对态度。” 2,3

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号