...
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Impact of a single eGFR and eGFR-estimating equation on chronic kidney disease reclassification: a cohort study in primary care
【24h】

Impact of a single eGFR and eGFR-estimating equation on chronic kidney disease reclassification: a cohort study in primary care

机译:单个eGFR和eGFR估计方程对慢性肾脏疾病重分类的影响:基层医疗的队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is diagnosed using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR). The eGFR is calculated from serum creatinine levels using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) or Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations.Aim To compare the performance of one versus two eGFR/ACR measurements, and the impact of equation choice, on CKD diagnosis and classification.Design and setting Cohort study in primary care in the Thames Valley region of the UK.Method Data were from 485 participants aged 60 years in the Oxford Renal Cohort Study with at least two eGFR tests. The proportion of study participants diagnosed and classified into different CKD stages using one and two positive tests were compared. Prevalence of CKD diagnosis and classification by CKD stage were compared when eGFR was calculated using MDRD and CKD-EPI equations.Results Participants included in the analysis had a mean age of 72.1 (±6.8) years and 57.0% were female. Use of a single screening test overestimated the proportion of people with CKD by around 25% no matter which equation was used, compared with the use of two tests. The mean eGFR was 1.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI = 1.1 to 1.6) higher using the CKD-EPI equation compared with the MDRD equation. More patients were diagnosed with CKD when using the MDRD equation, compared with the CKD-EPI equation, once (64% versus 63%, respectively) and twice (39% versus 38%, respectively), and 16 individuals, all of who had CKD stages 2 or 3A with MDRD, were reclassified as having a normal urinary ACR when using the CKD-EPI equation.Conclusion Current guidance to use two eGFR measures to diagnose CKD remains appropriate in an older primary care population to avoid overdiagnosis. A change from MDRD to CKD-EPI equation could result in one in 12 patients with a CKD diagnosis with MDRD no longer having a diagnosis of CKD.
机译:背景使用估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和尿白蛋白:肌酐比率(ACR)诊断慢性肾脏病(CKD)。 eGFR是根据肾脏疾病饮食(MDRD)或慢性肾脏病流行病学协作(CKD-EPI)等式从血清肌酐水平计算得出的。目的比较一两次eGFR / ACR测量的性能以及在CKD诊断和分类上选择方程式进行选择。设计和设置英国泰晤士河谷地区初级保健中的队列研究。方法数据来自485名年龄在60岁以上的牛津肾脏队列研究参与者,至少进行了两次eGFR测试。比较使用一种和两种阳性测试诊断并分为不同CKD阶段的研究参与者的比例。使用MDRD和CKD-EPI方程计算eGFR时,比较了CKD诊断和CKD分期的患病率。结果分析的参与者平均年龄为72.1(±6.8)岁,女性为57.0%。与使用两次筛查相比,无论使用哪种方程式,一次筛查试验的使用都高估了CKD患者的比例约25%。与MDRD方程相比,使用CKD-EPI方程平均eGFR高1.4 ml / min / 1.73 m2(95%CI = 1.1至1.6)。与CKD-EPI方程相比,使用MDRD方程诊断出更多CKD的患者有一次(分别为64%和63%)和两次(分别为39%和38%)和16个人,所有这些人都有当使用CKD-EPI方程时,具有MDRD的CKD第2或3A期被重新归类为具有正常尿ACR。结论对于较早的初级保健人群,使用两种eGFR措施诊断CKD的当前指南仍然适用,以避免过度诊断。从MDRD更改为CKD-EPI方程可能导致每12名诊断为CKD的患者中MDRD不再诊断为CKD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号