【24h】

Leaping Black Swans

机译:飞跃黑天鹅

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

What is the most effective way to protect against significant market downturns while retaining good upside participation? While many researchers have scrutinized the subject of portfolio insurance (PI), most academic studies on the subject have concluded that options-based strategies are broadly inferior to those that use asset allocation shifts to reduce risk. Yet such studies also have one serious limitation: they tend to focus on protective put options rather than considering other candidates, such as call options. This is the gap that professors William Trainor (East Tennessee State University), Indudeep Chhachhi, and Christopher Brown (both of Western Kentucky University) seek to fill in Leaping Black Swans, published in the February 2019 Issue of The Journal of Investing. They find that portfolios comprising 10% call options and 90% conventional bonds outperform alternative portfolio insurance approaches—both options-based and asset allocation-based—in terms of average arithmetic return and a range of risk metrics.
机译:在保持良好的上进参与的同时,防止最严重的市场衰退的最有效方法是什么?尽管许多研究人员已经仔细研究了证券投资保险(PI)的主题,但大多数对此主题的学术研究得出的结论是,基于期权的策略远不如那些使用资产分配转移来降低风险的策略。然而,这样的研究也有一个严重的局限性:它们倾向于集中于保护性看跌期权而不是考虑其他候选人,例如看涨期权。这就是William Trainor(东田纳西州立大学),Indudeep Chhachhi和Christopher Brown(西肯塔基大学的两位)教授试图填补《飞跃的黑天鹅》(Leaping Black Swans)的空白,该出版物发表于2019年2月的《投资杂志》上。他们发现,在平均算术收益率和一系列风险指标方面,由10%的看涨期权和90%的传统债券组成的投资组合优于基于选择权和资产分配的另类投资组合保险方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号