【2h】

COVID-19: Black Swan or clumsy use?

机译:Covid-19:黑天鹅或笨拙的用途?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

“Black Swan” is an unexpected and catastrophic event characterized by three conditions: the anomalous and exceptional value, the extreme impact, and predictability a posteriori. On many sides – by politicians, commentators, scientists – there have been attempts to give the COVID-19 pandemic event the meaning of Black Swan. In reality, one should wonder if the Black Swan was not, instead (or even), the way the epidemic was handled. In Italy, an unreasonable use of a two-step protocol - IgM/IgG anti-COVID followed by RT-PCR in the serologically positive only has caused considerable uncertainty, particularly relevant in measures for maintenance or readmission to work of health personnel. This protocol could be affected by serious uncertainties arising from the analytical limitations of the tests used. To quantify this defect, we evaluated the analytical specifications of serological tests under different prevalence conditions. In conclusion, although laboratory diagnostics represent a useful tool, it can only be used for epidemiological purposes and not to provide healthy pass.
机译:“黑天鹅”是一种意外和灾难性的事件,其特征在于三种条件:异常和卓越的价值,极度影响,可预测性是后验。在许多方面 - 由政治家,评论员,科学家 - 已经试图给Covid-19大流行事件留下黑天鹅的含义。实际上,一个人应该想知道黑色天鹅不是(甚至是),而是处理流行病的方式。在意大利,不合理使用两步协议 - IGM / IgG抗COVID其次是RT-PCR的血清学阳性只造成了相当大的不确定性,在维护或重新进入卫生人员的工作措施尤为重要。该议定议可能受到使用的分析限制所产生的严重不确定性的影响。为了量化这种缺陷,我们在不同流行条件下评估了血清学试验的分析规范。总之,虽然实验室诊断代表了一个有用的工具,但它只能用于流行病学目的,而不是提供健康的通行证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号